|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Two-part question | |||
| Part 1. Which of these teams has the STRONGEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Pittsburgh |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| San Francisco |
  
|
26 | 92.86% |
| Los Angeles |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Tennessee |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Part 2. Which of these teams has the WEAKEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Pittsburgh |
|
0 | 0% |
| San Francisco |
|
1 | 3.57% |
| Los Angeles |
|
20 | 71.43% |
| Tennessee |
|
8 | 28.57% |
| Wait, there's a team in Los Angeles now? |
|
1 | 3.57% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
06-23-2016, 12:59 PM
|
#1 | |
|
Seize life. Be an ermine.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $-522449
 VARSITY
|
Quote:
__________________
Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history. |
|
|
Posts: 145,310
  |
|
|
06-23-2016, 01:07 PM
|
#2 | |
|
In BB I trust
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, Mass.
Casino cash: $10029808
|
Quote:
Plus Montana/Young >>> Roethlisberger/Bradshaw. Roethelisberger is pretty damn good, but he isn't top ten all time, which both Montana/Young are IMHO. And I didn't watch him play during the SB years (i'm not quite that old), but I think Bradshaw is at least somewhat overrated. Seems to me his SB wins were more the product of ridiculously talented teams than his own awesomeness. And, like you say, behind those top two for each, it's SF > Pitt also.
__________________
"I love signature blocks on the Internet. I get to put whatever the hell I want in quotes, pick a pretend author, and bang, it's like he really said it." George Washington |
|
|
Posts: 43,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterbackery: Round 2, Heat 4
Hybrid Mode
