|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Two particle question | |||
| Part 1. Which of these teams has the STRONGEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
   
|
1 | 5.26% |
| Atlanta |
  
|
15 | 78.95% |
| Baltimore |
  
|
4 | 21.05% |
| Chicago |
  
|
1 | 5.26% |
| Cleveland |
  
|
2 | 10.53% |
| Part 2. Which of these teams has the WEAKEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
  
|
2 | 10.53% |
| Atlanta |
|
2 | 10.53% |
| Baltimore |
|
2 | 10.53% |
| Chicago |
|
12 | 63.16% |
| Cleveland |
|
5 | 26.32% |
| I don't know about quarterbacks, but these cities all frighten me. |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-24-2016, 11:08 PM
|
#2 |
|
Seize life. Be an ermine.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $-472449
 VARSITY
|
I think Atlanta is easily the strongest. Bartkowski, Ryan, Chandler, Vick, and Hebert were decent and total 33 years of service. That's not a recipe for a Super Bowl, but their QBs weren't hurting them in most years.
I'd probably list Baltimore second, and maybe even first. If you scale up for 50 years, 20 years of Flacco isn't a bad fate, and they had a few other fading veterans who were okay. I'd list Cleveland third. Sipe was okay, and Kosar and Ryan were pretty good. I'd list Chicago last. They're a disaster. Cutler is their best QB of the past half-century.
__________________
Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history. |
|
Posts: 145,274
  |
|
|
|
Quarterbackery: Round 2, Heat 5
Threaded Mode