|
|
View Poll Results: Do you want Foles to take over the QB position | |||
Yes, he offers us a real shot at a Championship |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 21.80% |
No, Alex is the man |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
82 | 61.65% |
Doesn't matter ,either way we suck |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 6.77% |
I would like to order a few bags of boar #1725 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 9.77% |
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Best Body On ChiefsPlanet
Join Date: Jan 2014
Casino cash: $-525100
|
Quote:
You want a QB like Brees, Brady, Luck, Rodgers etc so we can score 50 pts a game because fans like to see offense... Okay. I get that. Fine, but be prepared to pay the price. Those guys cost money and our defense will lose talent and suffer because of it. Personally I'd rather have an elite D than an elite QB... Defense wins championships. As far as people saying Foles looked so much better than Alex in the Colts gm. Not buying that he is better because of one game. Might want to check out some highlights from Foles years with the Rams. He was god awful. Pretty bad in his years with the Eagles as well. He had one good fluke year, big deal. Cassel threw 27 TDs 7 INTs one year as well. |
|
Posts: 6,285
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Mindful Taoist German
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $6501662
|
Quote:
But isn't starting this week and isn't going to be active... ![]()
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Posts: 78,111
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
oxymoron
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $9556299
|
No, I do not. I also don't think Alex is the man.
|
Posts: 58,682
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
ON CP YOU’RE SOMEBODY’S BITCH!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Da SEI
Casino cash: $2224809
|
Quote:
I've watched a lot of Foles with the Eagles. Nothing can convince me that his good stretch was flukey. I didn't see much of him in St. Louis, but I don't think he was at a place that was by any means, right for him....a lot of "good" QB's would struggle there. |
|
Posts: 13,304
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Mindful Taoist German
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $6501662
|
Foles had no weapons there.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 78,111
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Best Body On ChiefsPlanet
Join Date: Jan 2014
Casino cash: $-525100
|
Quote:
To be fair to the Rams great QBs make the players around them better. I think we can all agree on that. I don't think Foles did much of that when he was there. Foles is a great backup. But IMO he is decent starter at best, at worst probably a pretty bad starting QB. |
|
Posts: 6,285
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|