|
![]() |
#76 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $-810901
|
Quote:
"Yeah, in that situation where hall of fame QBs come through maybe 1 time out of 5, I'm pretty down on Smiths ability to pull it from the fire..." Well no shit. Truly a fair bar. I mean hell, the guy only did it once this year and it wasn't on the road so **** him in the face. Seriously, for all the shit that Bwillies undeniably stupid ****ing post received, yours is somehow dumber still. People aren't giving you enough credit for this gorgeous bit of dipshittery.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 66,833
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
I'd like to see 3 or 4 quality football posts from you but odds are slim to none
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Casino cash: $6836512
|
I agree but it was two overthrown passes. The Conley drop early on was on the money though so I'll give him one back
|
Posts: 1,723
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nowhere
Casino cash: $10017949
|
Yards and completions don't mean shit when you still don't score touchdowns. Alex Smith has proven over his career that he is rarely capable of more than 1 passing touchdown in a game.
|
Posts: 4,649
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Casino cash: $10014156
|
Quote:
Congrats KC! Big game on Thursday. Raider fan out here are all up in themselves over todays win. I'm counting on the chiefs to shut them all up this week.
__________________
**disclaimer. Nothing in this post was meant to offend, or in any way slander the good people of Kansas City or the obviously passionate fans of the KC Chiefs. |
|
Posts: 2,763
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 |
**** off
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York
Casino cash: $6331882
|
He had a good game and made some good throws. The O-Line gave him good protection too.
I'm okay with his stat-line if we get that game in, game out from Smith.
__________________
"**** up once, lose two teeth....” |
Posts: 5,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
Also pleased with his overall performance, when considering that our run game has been.. less than good. More games like this, and I'll not only be open to a fair SB shot, I'll expect it.
![]()
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,482
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Drunk in the Neighborhood
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Beating the War Drums
Casino cash: $10001837
|
|
Posts: 5,974
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1725503
|
Quote:
I haven't had much confidence in Alex's ability to close games until this year. With his performance at San Diego and Denver, he certainly deserves a benefit of the doubt. Alex didn't have a perfect performance. It doesn't happen unless Alex played a much more aggressive version of himself... but he did. |
|
Posts: 51,650
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
I can say as I am watchig more, I am unimpessed with some of Fulton's efforts.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,482
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1725503
|
Usually it's Alex Smith. But that wasn't the case yesterday.
When he doesn't press, the defense loads the box and stuffs the run game. When he goes into a conservative shell, he pump fakes to his first reads instead of getting rid of the ball, so he holds onto the ball longer than he needs to. It also helped that Reid was more creative with the playcalling, so he needs to be aggressive too. I don't know why we waited so long in the season to start showing jet sweeps and options, which keep the defense on their feet. It's amazing how much better the OL looks when Alex plays aggressive football. |
Posts: 51,650
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 | ||
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
Quote:
Most of what Smith does is by design.. from Reid. You can tell that Andy draws up lots of screens and designs to get the ball to just one target. You can tell that Andy doesn't want to risk Smith taking many hits. First intended target is open at all, Smith will go to him... and he frequently does. Say that this first target is Hill on an 8 yard curl. Remotely open, and Smith hits him. He doesn't wait to see if Kelce.. the next option.. is getting open on a flag route. Why? because pass rush.. and he won't abandon the 8 yard gain just on the chance that maybe the next option might get open.. and maybe he'll have time to get it there. Smith is not a risk taker.. and only becomes one when it becomes more clearly necessary. Yesterday was both HC and QB recognizing that the ATL offense might slaughter on the scoreboard.. and along with that, understanding that ATL was weaker in the secondary. AMEN for that, because the ATL defense was shutting down the KC run game. What little Ware got was nearly all on his own toughness and ability. Now, we see if Andy goes back to small ball... actually, maybe not this week.. as OAK has similar strengths and weaknesses as ATL. 70/30 ratio, imho.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 16,482
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $-1065873
|
Hate to break it you you people but every QB, including Brady, Rodgers, Benny, all miss those kinds of passes like the ones to Ware. In fact, we have benefited over the years against those very QB's among others, by them doing just that. Shit happens.
|
Posts: 132,470
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 | |
Drunk in the Neighborhood
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Beating the War Drums
Casino cash: $10001837
|
Quote:
Ehringer already has solid fundamentals (hence him starting as a rookie). I think his loss was a bigger blow than most people realize. To the point of the previous poster's point, Fulton is a significant drop off. |
|
Posts: 5,974
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $-810901
|
Quote:
That wasn't a designed route, IMO. Ware saw the open space and ran upfield. Meanwhile Smith is running around trying to keep the play alive and had to make a bang/bang play. I agree with an earlier poster that he should've lofted it out there to give Ware a chance to run under it - failing to do so was a mistake. That said, that play was nowhere near the gimme that people are calling it. When guys are trying to essentially be psychic to determine how their teammate is going to handle a play, there's really nobody to blame if they can't pull it off. It was a tough but makeable play. In a playoff game, making it may be the difference between advancing or going home. That said, Smith has shown that he can make that play on occasion as well. There's nothing that happened on that play to suggest that he can't hit it should it happen again later. It's just not a 100% play. Sometimes he'll get it, sometimes he won't. You hope that the next time he does.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 66,833
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|