Chiefs Marcus Peters traded to Rams - Page 61

Sure-Oz · 12:50 PM

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...97064676052993
@AdamSchefter: Chiefs are expected to trade CB Marcus Peters to the Los Angeles Rams, sources tell ESPN. Teams are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today.

@AdamSchefter: Rams and Chiefs are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today.

@AdamSchefter: Marcus Peters to LA Rams trade is now officially agreed to, per source; cannot be processed until March 14. But Peters expected to be a Ram.

Tombstone RJ · 02-23-2018, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

Yeah, because it was all us liberals who had problem with the anthem protests.

****ing idiot.

So, you are actually admitting to voting for Obama?

Mile High Mania · 02-23-2018, 03:36 PM

Ha...

#Chiefs Andy Reid wasn’t sure if Marcus Peters wanted to play in KC any more and after speaking to his teammates engineered the trade.
BREAKING: Reid misunderstood Peterson’s teammates “just axe him” when inquiring if he wanted to be a Chief any longer.
— Jonathan Linn Rhea �� (@J_L_Rhea) February 23, 2018

**wazu** · 02-23-2018, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg

Schefter on NFL radio right now just said he doesn't believe the Rams gave up a 1st round pick. Thinks it involves picks in this year and next years draft. Picks only, no players.

Hoo boy. Bout to get ugly.

rico · 02-23-2018, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

Keep your dumbass comments to the Donk thread. Nobody cares about your opinion here. Your fake Gronk slam on Kelce is just stupid. He's clearly a top 3 TE in the league and you dream that Jake Butt will maybe someday be half as good as Kelce. As for the rest of your list of holes, if the Chiefs could fill all of those holes, I would be ecstatic. We would be the most stacked team in the NFL. Maybe ever. Every team had their holes, and we don't have to fill them all to contend for the Superbowl. I think that you are underselling Ragland as a JAG. But of course that's because you are looking for weaknesses.

Butt and the rest of the holes....

**Iowanian** · 02-23-2018, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

So you are calling for the Chiefs to trade Tyreek Hill next, correct?

Get back to me when tyreek hill's actions show that he isn't moving forward from his mistakes. Show me a report since he's been in KC where there has been any issue whatsoever.

People like you suggested I was an idiot for thinking and posting that Peters would probably be traded, and yet, here he is packing his bag today. I don't come into fandom expecting all players to be choir boys. In early discussions on Hill, I posted that I had concerns about character, but would see what happened. when my son started talking about him, I made the point that my son can cheer Hill's actions on the field, but he isn't a role model.

**DaneMcCloud** · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Ha...

#Chiefs Andy Reid wasn’t sure if Marcus Peters wanted to play in KC any more and after speaking to his teammates engineered the trade.
BREAKING: Reid misunderstood Peterson’s teammates “just axe him” when inquiring if he wanted to be a Chief any longer.
— Jonathan Linn Rhea �� (@J_L_Rhea) February 23, 2018

Not even funny and can't even get Peters name right

staylor26 · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg

Schefter on NFL radio right now just said he doesn't believe the Rams gave up a 1st round pick. Thinks it involves picks in this year and next years draft. Picks only, no players.

**** me

Chiefnj2 · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

Can the Rams pick up his 5th year option, or is it only the original team?

Mr_Tomahawk · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

For as "dumb" of a move as many make this out to be...it sounds like the Chiefs were having trouble drumming up a trade partner in this.

According to IanRap., the 49ers and Browns were the only other teams who were mildly interested in him. The Rams were apparently the only ones will to go in on a trade at the end.

...I am good with this move. Good Luck Rams.

**The Franchise** · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

If we didn't get a 1st.....then Veach can **** off.

**DaneMcCloud** · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg

Schefter on NFL radio right now just said he doesn't believe the Rams gave up a 1st round pick. Thinks it involves picks in this year and next years draft. Picks only, no players.

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu*******

jd1020 · 02-23-2018, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg

Schefter on NFL radio right now just said he doesn't believe the Rams gave up a 1st round pick. Thinks it involves picks in this year and next years draft. Picks only, no players.

I hope he's wrong. How would it be possible to trade a 25 year old CB who's already solidified himself as one of the best in the game and NOT get a 1st, especially since the other team only has one 2nd round pick to offer over the next 2 years?

**The Franchise** · 02-23-2018, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

For as "dumb" of a move as many make this out to be...it sounds like the Chiefs were having trouble drumming up a trade partner in this.

According to IanRap., the 49ers and Browns were the only other teams who were mildly interested in him. The Rams were apparently the only ones will to go in on a trade at the end.

...I am good with this move. Good Luck Rams.

It was the Rams and 49ers only. Browns weren't in it.

saphojunkie · 02-23-2018, 03:38 PM

It simply comes down to this: If Peters was willing to sign an extension, this is a mistake. If he was unwilling to sign an extension - THIS YEAR - then this had to be done.

Berry, Smith and Houston contracts crippled this organization, because they weren't done on time. Once you're in the last year of a deal and the tag has to be used - you're already gonna pay too much.

You had to extend Peters this year to avoid going into his year 5 option trying to work out a deal. It would have made him the highest paid CB in the league, and we already had the highest paid S and OLB.

I loved Peters since day one. I still think he's a badass, but this is a good business move if his desire for a trade is in any way legitimate, or if the Chiefs couldn't get him to sign an extension.

It's a bitter pill to swallow, though.

**ptlyon** · 02-23-2018, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrGiggity

Yes. Except for scarf.

Thexy!

02-23-2018, 12:03 PM
Sure-Oz Stay positive, don't give up Join Date: Dec 2001 Casino cash: $1809383	Marcus Peters traded to Rams https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...97064676052993 @AdamSchefter: Chiefs are expected to trade CB Marcus Peters to the Los Angeles Rams, sources tell ESPN. Teams are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today. @AdamSchefter: Rams and Chiefs are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today. @AdamSchefter: Marcus Peters to LA Rams trade is now officially agreed to, per source; cannot be processed until March 14. But Peters expected to be a Ram. Last edited by Sure-Oz; 02-23-2018 at 12:50 PM..
Posts: 46,292

02-23-2018, 03:36 PM	#902
Mile High Mania #triggering Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tejas Casino cash: $1077229	Ha... #Chiefs Andy Reid wasn’t sure if Marcus Peters wanted to play in KC any more and after speaking to his teammates engineered the trade. BREAKING: Reid misunderstood Peterson’s teammates “just axe him” when inquiring if he wanted to be a Chief any longer. — Jonathan Linn Rhea �� (@J_L_Rhea) February 23, 2018 __________________
Posts: 30,894

02-23-2018, 03:37 PM	#908
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6674388	Can the Rams pick up his 5th year option, or is it only the original team? __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,540

02-23-2018, 03:37 PM	#909
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $10526	For as "dumb" of a move as many make this out to be...it sounds like the Chiefs were having trouble drumming up a trade partner in this. According to IanRap., the 49ers and Browns were the only other teams who were mildly interested in him. The Rams were apparently the only ones will to go in on a trade at the end. ...I am good with this move. Good Luck Rams. __________________ Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
Posts: 18,619

02-23-2018, 03:37 PM	#910
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2085047	If we didn't get a 1st.....then Veach can **** off.
Posts: 92,316

02-23-2018, 03:38 PM	#914
saphojunkie MVP Join Date: Aug 2011 Casino cash: $2356550	It simply comes down to this: If Peters was willing to sign an extension, this is a mistake. If he was unwilling to sign an extension - THIS YEAR - then this had to be done. Berry, Smith and Houston contracts crippled this organization, because they weren't done on time. Once you're in the last year of a deal and the tag has to be used - you're already gonna pay too much. You had to extend Peters this year to avoid going into his year 5 option trying to work out a deal. It would have made him the highest paid CB in the league, and we already had the highest paid S and OLB. I loved Peters since day one. I still think he's a badass, but this is a good business move if his desire for a trade is in any way legitimate, or if the Chiefs couldn't get him to sign an extension. It's a bitter pill to swallow, though.
Posts: 12,907