Chiefs Marcus Peters traded to Rams - Page 109

Sure-Oz · 12:50 PM

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...97064676052993
@AdamSchefter: Chiefs are expected to trade CB Marcus Peters to the Los Angeles Rams, sources tell ESPN. Teams are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today.

@AdamSchefter: Rams and Chiefs are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today.

@AdamSchefter: Marcus Peters to LA Rams trade is now officially agreed to, per source; cannot be processed until March 14. But Peters expected to be a Ram.

TwistedChief · 02-23-2018, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

So it is a contract/money issue, according to Terez.

Yeah, because everything is so black and white and there won’t be every attempt to spin this by various parties and sources.

Simply Red · 02-23-2018, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6

If we sign shitbag Talib, I'll eat the biggest piece of shit you can find

Its not about 'thug life', its about where do you want to be?

we won't babe, no worries - he's a cuckold

FloridaMan88 · 02-23-2018, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Yeah Clark really had a problem paying Houston, Kelce and Berry the last few years.

Good god

The truth hurts for dumbshit homers such as yourself.

**Easy 6** · 02-23-2018, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

The Chiefs are taking 5 dollars for a 500 dollar bill in this situation, I'm glad that's worth it because you personally dislike him. That's just honestly bad business.

Assholes like you and Hamas wanna make it all about the flag and race culture because that ALL you've got

No, its about football and who is trustworthy with tens of millions

Its not about personal dislike, you dope... and the more you keep trying to make it so, only weakens your position

'Hamas' Jenkins · 02-23-2018, 08:05 PM

I will say this:

I get being pissed about the Chiefs trading Peters b/c he's an elite, young, cost-controlled player at a premium position, and it's nigh impossible to get commensurate value for those players.

Mecca · 02-23-2018, 08:05 PM

I don't think they wanted to pay Marcus Peters 18 mill so you play out his next 2 years and take your comp pick you don't trade him for a ****ing hot dog.

**cdcox** · 02-23-2018, 08:05 PM

Clark Hunt doesn't care about winning. Looking forward to this idiot ruining the Mahomes era.

jaa1025 · 02-23-2018, 08:05 PM

Rapaport: Peters trade not believed to include first-round pick

"As far as why the Chiefs want to get rid of him though, there are a couple reasons as well. Last year, he was suspended for his actions on-field. There was also getting into it with an assistant coach after the game last year when he got the suspension. In the locker room, there was certainly some issues the Chiefs wanted to solve, and they believe they did so by sending him elsewhere. There was also some concern inside the building about whether or not they wanted to pay Marcus Peters long-term, and from what I understand, Andy Reid, the head coach, was really not on board with Peters as a player and off the field -- owner Clark Hunt the same way. When those guys are not on board with keeping a guy and making sure he's part of their future, it is best to send him elsewhere, and that is what the Chiefs did for a package of picks not believed to be a first-rounder."

**DaneMcCloud** · 02-23-2018, 08:06 PM

The Chiefs knew that Marcus Peters would likely demand to be the game’s highest-paid corner, which would cost upwards of $18 million per season. So on Friday they decided to go in a different direction: https://t.co/doTi6qrVq6
— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) February 23, 2018

Exactly as I had stated since the new broke.

Clark Hunt wasn't going to be comfortable paying Peters 5 years, $90 million with $38-40 guaranteed.

FloridaMan88 · 02-23-2018, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief

Yeah, because everything is so black and white and there won’t be every attempt to spin this by various parties and sources.

This from someone who is willing to believe a random poster's "anonymous source", but not Terez freaking Paylor's reporting.

JFC.

Mecca · 02-23-2018, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6

Assholes like you and Hamas wanna make it all about the flag and race culture because that ALL you've got

No, its about football and who is trustworthy with tens of millions

Its not about personal dislike, you dope... and the more you keep trying to make it so, only weakens your position

The guy is controlled for 2 more ****ing years, I never said give him 80 million ****ing dollars.

You ride out the 2 years and take your comp pick before you let some team bend you over in front of the rest of the league.

cooper barrett · 02-23-2018, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief

Yes - West Village is south of 14th street on the west side. Chelsea north of 14th street. You’re now a NYC expert! Come and stay awhile.

Clay was up there, didn't get 3 miles from La Guardia

jaa1025 · 02-23-2018, 08:07 PM

I was on the biggest trade Peters bandwagon when he starting sitting during the anthem but if they don't get a 1st then that is one of the worst trades in NFL history.

Mecca · 02-23-2018, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaa1025

Rapaport: Peters trade not believed to include first-round pick

"As far as why the Chiefs want to get rid of him though, there are a couple reasons as well. Last year, he was suspended for his actions on-field. There was also getting into it with an assistant coach after the game last year when he got the suspension. In the locker room, there was certainly some issues the Chiefs wanted to solve, and they believe they did so by sending him elsewhere. There was also some concern inside the building about whether or not they wanted to pay Marcus Peters long-term, and from what I understand, Andy Reid, the head coach, was really not on board with Peters as a player and off the field -- owner Clark Hunt the same way. When those guys are not on board with keeping a guy and making sure he's part of their future, it is best to send him elsewhere, and that is what the Chiefs did for a package of picks not believed to be a first-rounder."

No first rounder, welcome the Chiefs new Gm Allard Baird.

keg in kc · 02-23-2018, 08:08 PM

It doesn't really matter that he didn't want to be here. He didn't have any leverage at all aside from holding out. The team had years of control left.

So if they didn't make an absolute killing on this trade (and it could be argued that even if they do...), they completely screwed the pooch on multiple levels, by not scouting him properly, by not handling him properly, by really not doing anything well at any point. You can point any fingers you want at him over the anthem bullshit or his on field antics, but they're supposed to figure those kind of issues ahead of time. They spend millions and millions and millions. The problem I see here is primarily with the front office, and with Reid, who we know is heavily involved on the personnel side. It worries me, and I think it should worry everyone. I don't see how anybody can possibly spin this in a positive way, unless we're getting historic compensation.

02-23-2018, 12:03 PM
Sure-Oz Stay positive, don't give up Join Date: Dec 2001 Casino cash: $1819383	Marcus Peters traded to Rams https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...97064676052993 @AdamSchefter: Chiefs are expected to trade CB Marcus Peters to the Los Angeles Rams, sources tell ESPN. Teams are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today. @AdamSchefter: Rams and Chiefs are in final stages of talks and barring an unexpected snag, the trade is expected to be agreed to as early as today. @AdamSchefter: Marcus Peters to LA Rams trade is now officially agreed to, per source; cannot be processed until March 14. But Peters expected to be a Ram. Last edited by Sure-Oz; 02-23-2018 at 12:50 PM..
Posts: 46,292

02-23-2018, 08:05 PM	#1625
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7279572	I will say this: I get being pissed about the Chiefs trading Peters b/c he's an elite, young, cost-controlled player at a premium position, and it's nigh impossible to get commensurate value for those players. __________________ "When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
Posts: 75,077

02-23-2018, 08:05 PM	#1626
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-492950	I don't think they wanted to pay Marcus Peters 18 mill so you play out his next 2 years and take your comp pick you don't trade him for a ****ing hot dog.
Posts: 115,250	1 0

02-23-2018, 08:05 PM	#1627
cdcox www.nfl-forecast.com Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $-458231	Clark Hunt doesn't care about winning. Looking forward to this idiot ruining the Mahomes era.
Posts: 46,032

02-23-2018, 08:05 PM	#1628
jaa1025 Veteran Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10000898	Rapaport: Peters trade not believed to include first-round pick "As far as why the Chiefs want to get rid of him though, there are a couple reasons as well. Last year, he was suspended for his actions on-field. There was also getting into it with an assistant coach after the game last year when he got the suspension. In the locker room, there was certainly some issues the Chiefs wanted to solve, and they believe they did so by sending him elsewhere. There was also some concern inside the building about whether or not they wanted to pay Marcus Peters long-term, and from what I understand, Andy Reid, the head coach, was really not on board with Peters as a player and off the field -- owner Clark Hunt the same way. When those guys are not on board with keeping a guy and making sure he's part of their future, it is best to send him elsewhere, and that is what the Chiefs did for a package of picks not believed to be a first-rounder."
Posts: 2,922

02-23-2018, 08:06 PM	#1629
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	The Chiefs knew that Marcus Peters would likely demand to be the game’s highest-paid corner, which would cost upwards of $18 million per season. So on Friday they decided to go in a different direction: https://t.co/doTi6qrVq6 — Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) February 23, 2018 Exactly as I had stated since the new broke. Clark Hunt wasn't going to be comfortable paying Peters 5 years, $90 million with $38-40 guaranteed.
Posts: 88,960

02-23-2018, 08:07 PM	#1633
jaa1025 Veteran Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10000898	I was on the biggest trade Peters bandwagon when he starting sitting during the anthem but if they don't get a 1st then that is one of the worst trades in NFL history.
Posts: 2,922

02-23-2018, 08:08 PM	#1635
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	It doesn't really matter that he didn't want to be here. He didn't have any leverage at all aside from holding out. The team had years of control left. So if they didn't make an absolute killing on this trade (and it could be argued that even if they do...), they completely screwed the pooch on multiple levels, by not scouting him properly, by not handling him properly, by really not doing anything well at any point. You can point any fingers you want at him over the anthem bullshit or his on field antics, but they're supposed to figure those kind of issues ahead of time. They spend millions and millions and millions. The problem I see here is primarily with the front office, and with Reid, who we know is heavily involved on the personnel side. It worries me, and I think it should worry everyone. I don't see how anybody can possibly spin this in a positive way, unless we're getting historic compensation.
Posts: 58,682