Mellinger: Marcus Peters is gone. The Chiefs have some explaining to do.

[jspchief]

Originally Posted by Coogs

I'm going to go with yes here. Numbers back it up. So does the eye test.

You have to be joking. His play on the field is the last thing to factor into this.

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by jspchief

You have to be joking. His play on the field is the last thing to factor into this.

No, I'm not really joking. I think he compromised the entire defense on a play by play basis.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Coogs

No, I'm not really joking. I think he compromised the entire defense on a play by play basis.

I read somewhere he either graded out 8-10 or 1-3 on a play to play basis

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by SAUTO

I read somewhere he either graded out 8-10 or 1-3 on a play to play basis

Stan Weber was saying this yesterday. Lots of 1-3 grades.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by Coogs

Stan Weber was saying this yesterday. Lots of 1-3 grades.

discussion of peters negative qualities and the benefits of getting rid of 22

reference:

https://omny.fm/shows/between-the-li...-stan-weber-91

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

discussion of peters negative qualities and the benefits of getting rid of 22

reference:

https://omny.fm/shows/between-the-li...-stan-weber-91

This is a good segment to listen to. Now yes, it is Keitzman paired with Weber, but Weber has some interesting points. And not just on Peters.

[TomBarndtsTwin]

Originally Posted by SAUTO

I read somewhere he either graded out 8-10 or 1-3 on a play to play basis

I’m not saying the Chiefs are a better team defensively without Peters, but it’s a bit telling that the Chiefs played their best team defensive game of the season against Oakland when Marcus was sat down.

Just something to think about going forward.

[farmerchief]

Originally Posted by Coogs

No, I'm not really joking. I think he compromised the entire defense on a play by play basis.

Peters made plenty of great plays, with the strips, and ints, but I often wandered how often he was freelancing and not playing within the scheme of the defense? Suttons schemes more often sucked than not, but it always made me wander?

[Red Beans]

Originally Posted by jspchief

You have to be joking. His play on the field is the last thing to factor into this.

Maybe, but maybe not. There's the possibility that he said, "**** the old man, and this scheme" and was freelancing a shit ton. I don't watch enough film to know. But it is a possibility.

[jspchief]

Originally Posted by Red Beans

Maybe, but maybe not. There's the possibility that he said, "**** the old man, and this scheme" and was freelancing a shit ton. I don't watch enough film to know. But it is a possibility.

You don't have to watch film. Just watch the games. Peters side of the field was not the issue.