|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $-810901
|
Quote:
But if we torch $2.5 million in cap space on Foster and he's a 10% improvement on Ragland for the 15 snaps/gm that Ragland's likely to play, that's NOT a good use of that cap space, not when it could be rolled into cap credits for next year instead. This is a fine argument to have in favor of bringing in Lee - there could be a real upgrade there if O'Daniel can't be trusted in space. But Foster and Ragland would both play a nominal role in this defense as neither can be trusted in coverage and Ragland's fine when he's coming downhill. At best I'd give him the CJ Spiller treatment. I'd have him in camp, cut him prior to week 1 and then re-sign him after week 1 when NFL veterans salaries are no longer guaranteed. Then if he continues to show better than Ragland in limited use, I'd keep him and cut Ragland. But I'd be extremely reluctant to guarantee money to a marginal 'thumper' linebacker who's role here will be fairly small and who's on the wrong side of 30.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 66,833
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Choco Favre
Join Date: Jul 2012
Casino cash: $-1195235
|
Quote:
I have no idea what kind of deal Foster will receive. Maybe he would be open to no guarantees in order to sign with a potential SB winning team. If so, as you said, you sign him no problem. I still wouldn't have a problem taking a bit of a risk and giving him some guaranteed money to compete with Ragland. If he beats out Ragland, then you cut him and recoup some of the money you gave to Foster. I just don't have a good feeling about our LB corps. They are by far the worst positional group on our defense and I'm willing to gamble in order to improve that position. |
|
Posts: 32,227
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $-810901
|
Quote:
That's a complementary position group in his defense. He builds around his DL and his secondary; the LBs are there to be piecemealed and matched up as needed. I think this team will be scrimping/scraping at LB for as long as Spags (or his progeny) are running the show. It's gonna be an offense first team anyway so that's where the most cap space will go, then you'll see the DL, then the secondary, then finally they'll put together a LB corps with what they have left and they'll figure out a way to make it work. When you embrace the fact that a position group somewhere is gonna suffer to keep us under the cap, I think you realize that situational deployment of cheaper players w/ particular skill-sets is the way to go. And to me, Foster has a largely redundant skill-set with Ragland and even Niemann on board.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 66,833
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $-1555266
|
I think he's out altogether. I think he shredded a knee or beat up some chick or something.
|
Posts: 60,001
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
11-5, baby
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Livin the dream
Casino cash: $2191557
|
Quote:
Assuming you can get Foster for, say, an extra $1M in cap space, that’s an acceptable tradeoff https://deadspin.com/skins-wait-until-right-before-training-camp-starts-to-c-1836640301 |
|
Posts: 22,416
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $-1555266
|
|
Posts: 60,001
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|