Antonio Brown accused of RAPE - Federal Lawsuit Filed

[chinaski]

Per TMZ

Antonio Brown Accused of Raping Former Trainer, Lawsuit Filed via @TMZ https://t.co/khGNY803SS

— Charles Stewart (@StewartTVNews) September 11, 2019

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by TribalElder

Patriots are such sleazy ****s

why worry about a petty thing like RAPE when there's a football game against the Miami Dolphins to win???

[RobertWeathers]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

Feel free to google it yourself while you're searching up your rape Defense, as it'll let you know that a polygraph admittance is up to the judge presiding the case.

He also can be punished without even being Guilty. If he can't produce evidence to support himself beyond she's a money hungry whore, he's ****ed. Ask Ezekiel Elliot.

I think you need to do the same. Varies from state to state, both parties consent and when/what the testing standard is.

In trials the burden of proving guilt is on the prosecution.

Just because Goodell can suspend a player doesn't make it the right thing to do.

Elliot should have sued the NFL. He never should have been suspended.

[New World Order]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties

Jackin' dicks on backs for jesus

Pastor Mark stands up for wrongly accused Antonio Brown @AB84!��❤️

Donating $1.2 Million to his legal defense!

“This is clearly a hit job. AB is a man of God, he has attended my congregation for years.”#NeverForget pic.twitter.com/jeW0dsTtzq

— Pastor Mark Foundation® (@PastorMarkFnd) September 11, 2019

[RobertWeathers]

Originally Posted by New World Order

Legally, sure.

But not with the NFL's investigation.

If the NFL was a brain they'd ditch the shitty investigative apparatus and defer to the legal system to determine guilt/suspensions.

But since they don't....

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers

I think you need to do the same. Varies from state to state, both parties consent and when/what the testing standard is.

In trials the burden of proving guilt is on the prosecution.

Just because Goodell can suspend a player doesn't make it the right thing to do.

Elliot should have sued the NFL. He never should have been suspended.

It's a federal civil trial, you dumb ass.

[InChiefsHeaven]

My wife rapes me on the reg. It's glorious...

[jettio]

Seems like this accuser has 3 lawyers from 3 firms representing her.

If they actually plan to produce her for questioning with NFL investigators next week after a wedding, she is likely to be credible unless her lawyers have no damn sense at all.

If she does interview next week, AB will end up on exempt list unless she makes a terrible impression.

So is the $9 million already in AB's hands?

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by jettio

Seems like this accuser has 3 lawyers from 3 firms representing her.

If they actually plan to produce her for questioning with NFL investigators next week after a wedding, she is likely to be credible unless her lawyers have no damn sense at all.

If she does interview next week, AB will end up on exempt list unless she makes a terrible impression.

So is the $9 million already in AB's hands?

Hopefully Brown plays this weekend and breaks something.

[RobertWeathers]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

It's a federal civil trial, you dumb ass.

The point is the standard dumb ass.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell

My wife rapes me on the reg. It's glorious...

does she jack on your back?

[RobertWeathers]

Originally Posted by jettio

Seems like this accuser has 3 lawyers from 3 firms representing her.

If they actually plan to produce her for questioning with NFL investigators next week after a wedding, she is likely to be credible unless her lawyers have no damn sense at all.

If she does interview next week, AB will end up on exempt list unless she makes a terrible impression.

So is the $9 million already in AB's hands?

No. $5m now. $4m later all recoverable

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers

The point is the standard dumb ass.

You have no idea what you're even talking about, which is the point. Rape apologist guy.

You might want to huddle up with your fellow rape lovers on patsfans and come up with a better Defense.

[RobertWeathers]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

You have no idea what you're even talking about, which is the point. Rape apologist guy.

Neither do you. Nice redirect of the discussion.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers

Neither do you. Nice redirect of the discussion.

That's rich coming from the guy talking about state laws about a federal case.

Federal courts have their own rules on when to allow the admission of polygraph test evidence, and it is generally at the judge’s discretion.

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-libra...-in-court.html

There, I did it for you.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers

I'm sure that was the Chiefs intent.....give him time to sort out his life. During the offseason....

It was, indeed. Tyreek was completely honest with the organization from the outset, and they had his back throughout the process.

As the Kareem Hunt fiasco proved, the Chiefs will cut your ass in a heartbeat; Khunt lied to Reid and Clark Hunt. He told them he never left his hotel room, and they said they had his back as long as he was completely forthcoming. When the video surfaced, it turned out he lied, and they cut him.

Veach, Reid, and Clark Hunt want a Super Bowl, sure. But they also care about their players and their player's families.