Rockstar Burgers

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by candyman

Yeah, it does...if they were knowingly doing his drugs with him vs him slipping something in their drink...very different.

Okay, candyman

[candyman]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

Okay, candyman

I bet you're one of those people who believes addiction is a disease, aren't you?

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by candyman

I bet you're one of those people who believes addiction is a disease, aren't you?

You got me confused with someone who gives a shit on that front, m8.

Willingly consenting to one completely different thing doesn't suddenly mean that the perpetrator ever has any right to knowingly take someone that's clearly incapable of making decisions on their own and **** a goddamn dog. It's pretty easy shit to figure out here Hoss.

Would you be cool and good with me having your mother **** a Husky as long as she consented to something that had nothing to do with ****ing that Husky?

[candyman]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

You got me confused with someone who gives a shit on that front, m8.

Willingly consenting to one completely different thing doesn't suddenly mean that the perpetrator ever has any right to knowingly take someone that's clearly incapable of making decisions on their own and **** a goddamn dog. It's pretty easy shit to figure out here Hoss.

Would you be cool and good with me having your mother **** a Husky as long as she consented to something that had nothing to do with ****ing that Husky?

Being high doesn't absolve you of making bad decisions. She supposedly went down on the dog, not unconsciously raped by it. If he threatened/forced her to do it that's a different story. I don't know because I haven't seen the video.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by candyman

Being high doesn't absolve you of making bad decisions. She supposedly went down on the dog, not unconsciously raped by it. If he threatened/forced her to do it that's a different story. I don't know because I haven't seen the video.

It certainly does if the giver of the drugs distributed it with that intent, which it seems that's the case.

Your logic is ****ing stupid.

[Willie Lanier]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

It certainly does if the giver of the drugs distributed it with that intent, which it seems that's the case.

Your logic is ****ing stupid.

I think this is a troll, given the absurdity of the argument, but if that's not the case this is a grade A tic tok...

[candyman]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

It certainly does if the giver of the drugs distributed it with that intent, which it seems that's the case.

Your logic is ****ing stupid.

If your aunt had nuts she'd be your uncle.

For all we know they were getting high together, she thought it'd be fun to suck off Bandit and he grabbed the video camera.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by candyman

If your aunt had nuts she'd be your uncle.

For all we know they were getting high together, she thought it'd be fun to suck off Bandit and he grabbed the video camera.

Ah yes I generally give benefit of the doubt to the guy that very knowingly recorded and uploaded beastiality porn. Makes perfect sense.

Great shit

[Willie Lanier]

Originally Posted by candyman

I bet you're one of those people who believes addiction is a disease, aren't you?

Trollolololol