Chiefs Should they have called this unnecessary roughness - Page 2

-King- · 12-08-2019, 11:25 PM

They would call this if it was on Brady #KCvsNE pic.twitter.com/Ml8caUNpxG
— Koro (@nonsmoknlifboat) December 8, 2019

This is an argument I'm having in another thread. Supposedly this hit should have been flagged because Mahomes was heading out of bounds even though he asnt officially out of bounds yet. IMO, there's no way this should be flagged. A player in bounds is a player in bounds and can get hit. As much as I'd love for Mahomes to be protected, objectively there's no way they should call a penalty here.

Also it's weird how people hate the refs but want to add even more subjectivity to how they rule. So now they have to guess if a player is clearly going out of bounds on not? Makes no sense to me but hey...I'm CPs chief contrarian so I may be way off...

View Poll Results: Should this be a penalty
Yes it's a penalty	117	80.69%
No it's not a penalty	18	12.41%
No it's not a penalty but -King- is still a dumbass	10	6.90%
Voters: 145. You may not vote on this poll

12-08-2019, 11:25 PM	Topic Starter
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $1925743	Should they have called this unnecessary roughness They would call this if it was on Brady #KCvsNE pic.twitter.com/Ml8caUNpxG — Koro (@nonsmoknlifboat) December 8, 2019 This is an argument I'm having in another thread. Supposedly this hit should have been flagged because Mahomes was heading out of bounds even though he asnt officially out of bounds yet. IMO, there's no way this should be flagged. A player in bounds is a player in bounds and can get hit. As much as I'd love for Mahomes to be protected, objectively there's no way they should call a penalty here. Also it's weird how people hate the refs but want to add even more subjectivity to how they rule. So now they have to guess if a player is clearly going out of bounds on not? Makes no sense to me but hey...I'm CPs chief contrarian so I may be way off...
Posts: 63,924