***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Mecca

I just left the house, traffic was shit, everyone out and about like it's vacation time.

Vermont is telling Costco and Wal-Mart to sell only essential products. This is a double-edged sword. It will deter some people from getting out but it will also cause increased hoarding. People will go buy "essentials" just to get out of the house.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY

I didn't realize we didn't have what we would need on the front end.

What is happening on the back end is absolutely brutal though. We do need to get up and running ASAP. As soon as we have the supplies and beds. I don't think people understand what can happen to this country on the back end. If we had the supplies, I would have never been for shelter in place, hence the response. I have said this before.

I have no idea what any of that means. Since you won't openly answer this:

You clearly did not agree with the stay at home effort. Do you wish to revise that now?

Do you acknowledge that without the mitigation efforts taken, and which you opposed, our healthcare workers would be even more overwhelmed than they are now?

[O.city]

Originally Posted by SAUTO

The doctors seemed fairly convinced yesterday

Doctors are dumbass dipshits. We dentist know our shit for real.

[FloridaMan88]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

I think they have had a great effect, sure there are some that don't care, but we have all seen the images of empty highways and places that are normally full.

I believe in the case of Florida they are going to lock down all the beaches and probably have police guarding the popular ones.

Florida’s Governor is signing an order allowing only “essential” businesses to remain open (this has already been in effect in South Florida for weeks).

Now the rest of the country can stop obsessing over what Florida is or is not doing.

Meanwhile has Missouri issued a stay at home order yet?

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

To use Missouri as an example again.

About 6 days ago, shortly after some of these lockdowns had been issued in/around St. Louis, there was a survey of highway accidents over a 3-5 day stretch (I don't recall specifically)

Over the same period of time one year prior, the accident rate was roughly 100 times higher. With no state lockdown order in place. Because people simply weren't on the road.

The idea that there are hundreds of people still out there operating fairly normally and therefore it means that nothing we're doing has a measurable impact is just folly.

If a plan requires 100% compliance - scrap that plan. That's a bad plan. If Andy Reid calls a game that requires everyone on the field to execute perfectly 100% of the time in order to win - that's a bad coach.

The amount of buy in we've seen in this country is pretty spectacular. But just as people know full well that smoking, drinking and driving, not wearing a seatbelt and a whole slew of other things are dangerous to themselves and others but do it anyway - people are going to defy these orders. It's going to happen.

So again, if the fundamental premise of your plan is that 350 million people are suddenly going to be come wholly obedient stewards of the public good - Jesus, that is an AWFUL plan. Get a new one.

Yeah it is a sucky plan but it is the only one we got left until reinforcements arrive (therapeutics and vaccine)

What's your plan when we are down 17-0 in the 4th with Alex Smith as your QB (and no Mahomes on the bench)?

[Donger]

Originally Posted by O.city

Doctors are dumbass dipshits. We dentist know our shit for real.

"Never trust a man that puts his hands in another man's mouth."

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by O.city

We don't really know yet if it has or not.

Yeah we dom look at other countries.

[BIG_DADDY]

Originally Posted by Donger

I have no idea what any of that means. Since you won't openly answer this:

You clearly did not agree with the stay at home effort. Do you wish to revise that now?

Do you acknowledge that without the mitigation efforts taken, and which you opposed, our healthcare workers would be even more overwhelmed than they are now?

I think my response was pretty clear. You just want to argue at this point.

[R Clark]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Yeah it is a sucky plan but it is the only one we got left until reinforcements arrive (therapeutics and vaccine)

What's your plan when we are down 17-0 in the 4th with Alex Smith as your QB (and no Mahomes on the bench)?

Punt

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Dr. Oz calling on Cuomo to lift restrictions on using HCQ

Looking for new sponsors I guess.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY

I think my response was pretty clear. You just want to argue at this point.

Not it wasn't, and no I don't. You've been pretty manly in this thread. I was curious if you're manly enough to admit you were wrong.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

Meanwhile has Missouri issued a stay at home order yet?

Nope our Gov hasn't. People have been trying to tell him to do so with no luck yet.

And I agree somewhat with him and others as long as the local cities are doing their own maybe there isn't a need, unless I am missing something. I am sure there are some towns though that don't give a shit and won't shut down unless they are forced to.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Vermont is telling Costco and Wal-Mart to sell only essential products. This is a double-edged sword. It will deter some people from getting out but it will also cause increased hoarding. People will go buy "essentials" just to get out of the house.

But what is essential? Like I bought dishwasher tabs today is that essential?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Yeah it is a sucky plan but it is the only one we got left until reinforcements arrive (therapeutics and vaccine)

What's your plan when we are down 17-0 in the 4th with Alex Smith as your QB?

It's not a plan. It's a pipe dream.

My plan for making it through this? That Giselle Bundchen will leave Tom Brady, see me at a Wal-Mart and decide she must have me before settling for merely making me her play toy and financially supporting my family.

That plan is just as much a plan as "everyone will just do what the government tells them to do..." It is equally as likely to happen.

It's a prayer with the name 'plan' attached to it.

That's my point. Or more accurately, my point is that policymakers know damn good and well that they aren't going to get 100% compliance and all this complaining is mostly hand-wringing and Kabuki theater. They want to be able to say "look - we TOLD these people to stay inside..." so that nobody blames them for anything. It's a CYA bitch-fest from policymakers.

Because their 'plan' of everyone being as calm as hindu cows and doing what they're told is just wholly unrealistic. You know it, I know it and they damn sure know it.

I have to believe they were factoring in 'acceptable noncompliance' and if they weren't...well like I said, that's a really shitty plan.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Nope our Gov hasn't. People have been trying to tell him to do so with no luck yet.

And I agree somewhat with him and others as long as the local cities are doing their own maybe there isn't a need, unless I am missing something. I am sure there are some towns though that don't give a shit and won't shut down unless they are forced to.

Did you see what our sheriff said in Facebook last week? Someone texted the post to my wife. He’s a ****ing idiot.