***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Monticore

You want you medical evidence the same way you get your Alien abductions?

Except there is actual hard evidence in these cases. What are you not understanding.

The only reason its considered Anecdotal is because there hasn't been a mass trial completed yet (But they are doing it)

So the EVIDENCE already existed, or they wouldn't be conducting TRIALS to prove it.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Fauci hasn't said it doesn't work.

He's a scientist and he's said, repeatedly, that he's not comfortable advocating for its use without significant testing to confirm that it does. Not anecdotally, but scientifically. Which is exactly what he should say. Though it's funny how eager we are to say "hey, lets get the data in" when discussing a potential pharmaceutical treatment but not when discussing potential returns on mitigation efforts.

Granted, people continue to chop up what he says to push positions they prefer, but he's never said "this doesn't work" - he's said that he's unwilling to say that it does. There's a MASSIVE difference there.

So I ask again - knowing what you know about the anecdotal results, the limited testing done (admittedly without random double-blind tests) and its history of use, in the event you contracted COVID and had an opportunity to use this early on, you'd say "no, it doesn't work, and there are slight risks associate with it. I do not want it..."

You're that confident based on Fauci's suggestions of temperance?

Yes

[Dartgod]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

For comparison to his current position, one could argue that is the most that man can gush

Except he wasn't gushing. Read the definition again.

Speak or write with effusiveness or exaggerated enthusiasm

That's not even what he was doing and some TwitterTard used that word to promote an agenda and you fell for it.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

Except there is actual hard evidence in these cases. What are you not understanding.

The only reason its considered Anecdotal is because there hasn't been a mass trial completed yet (But they are doing it)

So the EVIDENCE already existed, or they wouldn't be conducting TRIALS to prove it.

What hard evidence? Some French doctor, who's a little controversial, saying that it's worked? Lets see his proof.

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Donger

Some people say that they have seen bigfoot. Some people claim that they've been abducted by aliens.

Except nobody has seen big foot, Doctors have given these drugs to people and seen them improve.

Hence why they are now doing trials.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I don't know if you have or haven't. So, you want people to start taking this base don anecdotal evidence, is that correct?

Dude, seriously, WTF is you problem? Did I say anything about whether people should take this or not? Go back to DC if you're gonna play this Donger shit.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

Except nobody has seen big foot, Doctors have given these drugs to people and seen them improve.

Hence why they are now doing trials.

How do you know that nobody has seen bigfoot? They say they have.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Dude, seriously, WTF is you problem?

Simple questions an issue for you?

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Donger

What hard evidence? Some French doctor, who's a little controversial, saying that it's worked? Lets see his proof.

South Korea
Japan
India
France

Etc own governments health departments have approved it for treatment of coronavirus.

Doctors in many countries have said it works, there was a survey.

People recovering have said it saved their lives.

You comparing it to big foot when it comes to evidence shows you complete bias.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Titty Meat

Yes

You still maintain that he said 'this doesn't work' eh?

[Donger]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

South Korea
Japan
India
France

Etc own governments health departments have approved it for treatment of coronavirus.

Doctors in many countries have said it works, there was a survey.

People recovering have said it saved their lives.

You comparing it to big foot when it comes to evidence shows you complete bias.

All of it anecdotal. Do you know what that word means? And why I applied it to bigfoot sightings?

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

Except there is actual hard evidence in these cases. What are you not understanding.

The only reason its considered Anecdotal is because there hasn't been a mass trial completed yet (But they are doing it)

So the EVIDENCE already existed, or they wouldn't be conducting TRIALS to prove it.

Anecdotal does not equal hard evidence when you only know the numbers they wanted you to hear.

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Dartgod

Except he wasn't gushing. Read the definition again.



That's not even what he was doing and some TwitterTard used that word to promote an agenda and you fell for it.

I didn't fall for anything, I've promoted the drug combination from the start.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

Simple questions an issue for you?

Those aren't questions. Those are straw man arguments based on you putting words in my mouth or otherwise implying something I never even came close to saying. Just ****ing stop.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Those aren't questions. Those are straw man arguments based on you putting words in my mouth or otherwise implying something I never even came close to saying. Just ****ing stop.

This is a question, actually:

So, you want people to start taking this base don anecdotal evidence, is that correct?

Here, I'll show you how it's done. My answer is no.