***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I don't control anyone besides myself.

How's that Thanksgiving backlog looking, by the way?

You sure want to though.....

now quick..try and change the subject....

[arrowheadnation]

I will laugh my ass off if they require it to enter stadiums, arenas, movie theaters, etc. Force some of these anti-vax hippie's to chose between fun and their own stupidity.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by arrowheadnation

I will laugh my ass off if they require it to enter stadiums, arenas, movie theaters, etc. Force some of these anti-vax hippie's to chose between fun and their own stupidity.

That would probably be illegal simply on the basis of religious and medical reasons. Same way you can legally not be forced to take the flu vaccine. But hippies and stuff....

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

As expected it went right over your head. Then again once you get vaccinated what do you care if they wear a mask or not???

You need to worry less about them and more about you.

I actually care about other people, pete. But yes, once I'm vaccinated, I'll go back to normal. If people choose not to take it, and get sick, that'll be a shame but it is what it is.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

You sure want to though.....

now quick..try and change the subject....

I just responded, you twit.

So, when is the Thanksgiving backlog going to clear?

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I actually care about other people, pete. But yes, once I'm vaccinated, I'll go back to normal. If people choose not to take it, and get sick, that'll be a shame but it is what it is.

Might be hope for you yet, Donger. Aside from the BS that you care about people that is.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I just responded, you twit.

So, when is the Thanksgiving backlog going to clear?

I never said you didn't respond....JFC

So quick to change the subject

[O.city]

Originally Posted by petegz28

That would probably be illegal simply on the basis of religious and medical reasons. Same way you can legally not be forced to take the flu vaccine. But hippies and stuff....

You can be forced to take the flu vaccine.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Businesses can require employees to take according to an article my lawyer sent me this morning. I'll see if i can find it.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by O.city

You can be forced to take the flu vaccine.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Businesses can require employees to take according to an article my lawyer sent me this morning. I'll see if i can find it.

Dude, you can NOT be forced to take the flu shot. We have been over this already. The law provides for religious and medical exemptions. Our health system forces us to take the flu shot UNLESS, you have a religious or medical exemption. That is the law.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by O.city

You can be forced to take the flu vaccine.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Businesses can require employees to take according to an article my lawyer sent me this morning. I'll see if i can find it.

Originally Posted by petegz28

Dude, you can NOT be forced to take the flu shot. We have been over this already. The law provides for religious and medical exemptions. Our health system forces us to take the flu shot UNLESS, you have a religious or medical exemption. That is the law.

Let me put it this way, if you fire an employee for not taking the flu shot when they have filed a legal religious exemption you will get sued. Same for medical.

Now, you can force them to wear a mask or whatever but you cannot legally force them to take it if they file either of the above.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Dude, you can NOT be forced to take the flu shot. We have been over this already. The law provides for religious and medical exemptions. Our health system forces us to take the flu shot UNLESS, you have a religious or medical exemption. That is the law.

There are not many medical reasons for not taking a vaccine I don't think , there are limits to religious reasons as well, pretty much anybody can form a church and worship whatever they want , we have a church that worships pot as the sacrament in our town, he has been trying to pull the religious card for 40 years.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Monticore

There are not many medical reasons for not taking a vaccine I don't think , there are limits to religious reasons as well, pretty much anybody can form a church and worship whatever they want , we have a church that worships pot as the sacrament in our town, he has been trying to pull the religious card for 40 years.

https://gfidaholaw.com/mandatory-flu...us-exemptions/

[arrowheadnation]

Originally Posted by arrowheadnation

I will laugh my ass off if they require it to enter stadiums, arenas, movie theaters, etc. Force some of these anti-vax hippie's to chose between fun and their own stupidity.

Oh and even better yet....if employers require it. Will be interesting to see how many people quit their jobs because of their own prideful stupidity. #hireatwill

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

I never said you didn't respond....JFC

So quick to change the subject

Is there some reason why you don't want to answer that question?

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

Is there some reason why you don't want to answer that question?

Just to watch you squirm.....