***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[WhawhaWhat]

Originally Posted by Monticore

religious exemptions for the win I guess.

At least 16 people in Texas with measles are linked to Eagle Mountain International Church,[2] which is a part of Kenneth Copeland Ministries and is described as "anti-vaccine" and "vaccine-refusing."

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

I never claimed all the deaths were backlog....keep up, Donger.

And yes, you are

I didn't say all, pete. Try to read.

You claimed that a lot of the deaths reported last week were backlog. So, since we are already over 2,000 deaths today, I'm wondering if you think the backlog has cleared.

Pretty simple, really.

Or, were you just saying stupid things again? I'll accept that, since it's a very common occurrence.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I didn't say all, pete. Try to read.

You claimed that a lot of the deaths reported last week were backlog. So, since we are already over 2,000 deaths today, I'm wondering if you think the backlog has cleared.

Pretty simple, really.

Or, were you just saying stupid things again? I'll accept that, since it's a very common occurrence.

Squirm ..SQUIRM!!!!!

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by O.city

This approach has been in development for near 20 years. If it is this successful, essentially, we have just ended every viral pandemic in the future damn near immediately.

With this approach, you can insert said viral epitope and you're done.

It's really amazin.g

Pump your brakes a little bit.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by loochy

Bell's Palsy is awesome! I can be just like Hafthor!

Oh, look, another moron that doesn't know how to read clinical data that suddenly thinks he's qualified to discuss adverse drug reactions. Just what we need!

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat

I wish I knew about this religious exception stuff, I would have never stopped sacrificing virgins.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Pump your brakes a little bit.

If you know the technology is safe, I'm not sure what else you need?

[loochy]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Oh, look, another moron that doesn't know how to read clinical data that suddenly thinks he's qualified to discuss adverse drug reactions. Just what we need!

There is no need to be such an aloof dick...no need at all.




They mention Bell's Palsy...I mention someone who suffers from it...you start in on demeaning people. Why?

[sedated]

Originally Posted by Monticore

Most Religions were created way before vaccines were ever developed , doubt it says anywhere they can't take vaccines specifically so it more of a cope out.

Yeah...religious people would never twist an interpretation.

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by sedated

Yeah...religious people would never twist an interpretation.

And the United States' public health apparatus has never acted unethically.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Monticore

Most Religions were created way before vaccines were ever developed , doubt it says anywhere they can't take vaccines specifically so it more of a cope out.

Yeah, it doesn't quite add up...but I guess religions can be ever evolving, right? It's not like a religion has to register a set of rules and keep them updated in some sort of official record, right? Basically, anyone can twist it around any way they want.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by sedated

Yeah...religious people would never twist an interpretation.

Non-religious people on the other hand......

[loochy]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Non-religious people on the other hand......

Let's just all agree that no person anywhere is honest about anything at any time.

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by Monticore

I wish I knew about this religious exception stuff, I would have never stopped sacrificing virgins.

Religious exceptions for those who didn't already belong to one of those churches that reject science, are not going to happen.

You don't have a religious right to attend a Royals/Chiefs game. Take the family to Sprint center to see your favorite band. And no business is going to be forced to hire people based on a religious exception to not taking the covid vaccine.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by loochy

Let's just all agree that no person anywhere is honest about anything at any time.

Me? I'm dishonest, and a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for, because you can never predict when they're going to do something incredibly stupid