***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[SupDock]

Originally Posted by Monticore

Hospitals have more motive to keep COVID patients out if hospitals because they make way more with all the other shit they do.

Or they would make more money by discharging patients and admitting new ones. They are trying to reduce the length of stay. This makes no sense.

[RaidersOftheCellar]

Originally Posted by Monticore

Did a Pfizer employee steal your wife or something?

I've never trusted Big Pharma, and I don't see a reason to trust them more simply because corporate media is painting them as our saviors right now.

Two years ago Pharma had sunk to dead last in US industry ratings according to a Gallup poll. Amazing turnaround.

[RaidersOftheCellar]

Originally Posted by DaFace

We've discussed it, and it probably isn't too far off. However, I think there's a tiny bit of value value in people who make it clear how far off the deep end a lot of anti-vaxxers are.

So you want this place to be as fascistic as Facebook? Guess I shouldn't be surprised.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar

I've never trusted Big Pharma, and I don't see a reason to trust them more simply because corporate media is painting them as our saviors right now.

Two years ago Pharma had sunk to dead last in US industry ratings according to a Gallup poll. Amazing turnaround.

You know the 2 co-authors of Dr Zelenko s latest paper both work for pharmaceutical companies why do you trust them?



You are basing your opinion on perception rather than facts .

[wazu]

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar

So you want this place to be as fascistic as Facebook? Guess I shouldn't be surprised.

You literally quoted him stating the exact opposite of that.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by AustinChief

It's funny to see the weird psychology involved with how people are handling this.

A good example... Covid is an extremely low risk infection for most people (let's ignore the elderly and fatties) but a huge number of people act as if it's a death sentence and are hyper emotional over it. We also know that the vaccines are extremely low risk yet there is another distinct group who are convinced it's a conspiracy or some crazy risky thing.

What is amazing to me is how each group is not seeing the statistical hypocrisy of claiming one low risk thing is a big deal but the other is not..

Everyone knows the risks but there are some that can't accept letting people make up their own minds because they know better.

[Chief Pagan]

SAN ANTONIO — At least two hospitals in Houston have been so overwhelmed with coronavirus patients this week that officials erected overflow tents outside. In Austin, hospitals were nearly out of beds in their intensive care units. And in San Antonio, a spike in virus cases reached alarming levels not seen in months, with children as young as 2 months old tethered to supplemental oxygen.

In recent days, Texas has averaged about 12,400 new cases a day, nearly double the number seen just two weeks ago, according to a New York Times database. The spike comes as about one in five U.S. hospitals with intensive care units, or 583 total hospitals, recently reported that at least 95 percent of their I.C.U. beds were full. One worry about the highly contagious Delta variant, which has fueled surges across the country, is whether it might test the capacity of health systems.

The number of coronavirus-related hospitalizations across the state is projected to climb to well over 15,000 by the end of August, according to the University of Texas at Austin’s Covid-19 model consortium.

“The fact that we’re having to construct the tents shows that the system in general is not prepared,” said Amanda Callaway, associate administrator for Harris Health System, which oversees the two hospitals in the Houston area requiring overflow space. “There’s lots of concern. There’s only so much you can do, only so many rooms. We’re just trying to respond as fast as we can.”

Aside from the tents, doctors are also treating patients in waiting rooms because of a shortage of beds, she said, adding that at least 90 percent of the coronavirus patients are unvaccinated.


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/11/u...tions-icu.html

[TLO]

FDA expected to authorize Covid-19 vaccine booster shots for some immunocompromised people within the next 48 hours

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by TLO

FDA expected to authorize Covid-19 vaccine booster shots for some immunocompromised people within the next 48 hours

In other words, people who are overweight/elderly?

This is who should have been targeted for treatment from the get go.

[wazu]

Originally Posted by stevieray

In other words, people who are overweight/elderly?

This is who should have been targeted for treatment from the get go.

They were.

[RaidersOftheCellar]

Originally Posted by SupDock

Or they would make more money by discharging patients and admitting new ones. They are trying to reduce the length of stay. This makes no sense.

Medicare paid huge sums for every patient admitted for Covid and triple that figure for every patient treated with a ventilator.

I'm not saying there was widespread abuse, but there definitely was at certain hospitals like Elmhurst in Queens.

[RaidersOftheCellar]

Originally Posted by wazu

You literally quoted him stating the exact opposite of that.

He said a ban "probably isn't too far off."

That's the exact opposite?

[O.city]

Originally Posted by stevieray

In other words, people who are overweight/elderly?

This is who should have been targeted for treatment from the get go.

No

People with immune issues. Cancer, lupus, diabetic, etc.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by O.city

No

People with immune issues. Cancer, lupus, diabetic, etc.

Thank you.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by wazu

They were.

hmmm. I believe the elderly were.