|
|
View Poll Results: Which one do you pick? | |||
Wyoming, plus $250,000 annual stipend |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 64.86% |
Missouri + $700,000 annual stipend |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 35.14% |
Gosh, I can't decide. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#2 |
Seize life. Be an ermine.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $-692449
![]() |
This is a juxtaposition of two very different offerings.
The Missouri house is amazing. It's enormous and has everything that a person could want. It's convenient to a large city, but of course that large city is St. Louis. (Insert gif of cringing person here.) You'd have a ton of money to play with, too. The Jackson house is a lot smaller, but what a view and setting. The town of Jackson is nice and you could get a lot of outdoor time in Yellowstone. But you're not running wild on the minimum $250,000 stipend. I'd like to pick Missouri just because Jackson is off the market and it's a pain to find a link, but in real life I'd go Jackson all the way. I've lived in the Rockies and I've lived in St. Louis, and those experiences drive my decision.
__________________
Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history. |
Posts: 145,520
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|