Football Bills fan Kyle Brandt caught flip-flopping in 4k

staylor26 · 01-25-2022, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

The OT rules should be changed. I’ve thought this ever since it happened to Mahomes in 2018 against Brady.

If Josh Allen won that coin flip our season would be over. That’s the truth.

Both teams should touch the ball. It’s a huge advantage for offenses in that scenario bc not only is the game changed to favor offense, but both defenses are gassed. They’re dead tired.

Keep the rules the same except the team that lost the coin flip gets a chance to get a TD if the team that won the coin flip gets a TD first

So let’s say Buffalo gets a chance and gets a TD.

Then the Chiefs get the ball and get another TD.

Is that game over?

Are we not right back where we started? It’s not fair because Buffalo didn’t get a chance again?

It’s absurd. The OT rules are fine, and I wasn’t somebody complaining back in 2018 either.

The rules are the way they are because of injuries. The longer the game, the more the likelihood of serious injuries.

Pants · 01-25-2022, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

So let’s say Buffalo gets a chance and gets a TD.

Then the Chiefs get the ball and get another TD.

Is that game over?

Are we not right back where we started? It’s not fair because Buffalo didn’t get a chance again?

It’s absurd. The OT rules are fine, and I wasn’t somebody complaining back in 2018 either.

The rules are the way they are because of injuries. The longer the game, the more the likelihood of serious injuries.

Shawn Barber's idea is that in case of a tie, the higher seed moves on. I SORT of like it?

**ChiTown** · 01-25-2022, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants

Shawn Barber's idea is that in case of a tie, the higher seed moves on. I SORT of like it?

That sounds absolutely moronic to me.

Pants · 01-25-2022, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown

That sounds absolutely moronic to me.

Sorry, that was supposed to be the lower seed. Basically, the team hosting the game. He was equating it to boxing/MMA. If a match for the belt ends in a draw, does the champ lose the belt? No. You have to beat the champ. The draw doesn't give you the belt and a draw should not let you move on if you're the higher seeded team.

**ChiTown** · 01-25-2022, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants

Sorry, that was supposed to be the lower seed. Basically, the team hosting the game. He was equating it to boxing/MMA. If a match for the belt ends in a draw, does the champ lose the belt? No. You have to beat the champ. The draw doesn't give you the belt and a draw should not let you move on if you're the higher seeded team.

I wish that made me change my mind on what I think about his idea

Pasta Little Brioni · 01-25-2022, 12:28 PM

I just don't understand why people think it's a guarantee TD on the first possession of OT. It's not and data proves it if you don't cherry pick. The Bills don't get an imaginary pretend TD drive fir a hypothetical coin toss loss just like KC in 19. Bills lost legitly end of story

ToxSocks · 01-25-2022, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother

I just don't understand why people think it's a guarantee TD on the first possession of OT. It's not and data proves it if you don't cherry pick. The Bills don't get an imaginary pretend TD drive fir a hypothetical coin toss loss just like KC in 19. Bills lost legitly end of story

20%, man.

Teams who receive the 1st possession score a TD on the opening drive only 20% of the time.

It's a NON-ISSUE.

Red Dawg · 01-25-2022, 12:43 PM

What a ****ing stupid ****ing idea. Why not just play the game forever until we get the winner we want.

Him and Pat Mac can go **** themselves in their pussies. The Bills had 60 minutes to win the game. In that time they failed. They had to keep us from completing a 75 yard drive to get a td and hold us to an FG. They failed to give themselves the ball back. The NFL didn't not fail to give them a second chance, they failed to give themselves a second chance.

But Allen didn't his shot? Well, then he can blame himself for not having more points and winning outright or he can look to his left and blame the 11 guys that went full bitch in the OT.

Whine like pussies all you want Bills fans. Life isn't fair.

BWillie · 01-25-2022, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

So let’s say Buffalo gets a chance and gets a TD.

Then the Chiefs get the ball and get another TD.

Is that game over?

Are we not right back where we started? It’s not fair because Buffalo didn’t get a chance again?

It’s absurd. The OT rules are fine, and I wasn’t somebody complaining back in 2018 either.

The rules are the way they are because of injuries. The longer the game, the more the likelihood of serious injuries.

You make them go for two, and a turnover loses the game if the other team gets at least a FG.

RunKC · 01-25-2022, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

So let’s say Buffalo gets a chance and gets a TD.

Then the Chiefs get the ball and get another TD.

Is that game over?

Are we not right back where we started? It’s not fair because Buffalo didn’t get a chance again?

It’s absurd. The OT rules are fine, and I wasn’t somebody complaining back in 2018 either.

The rules are the way they are because of injuries. The longer the game, the more the likelihood of serious injuries.

Keep going until either:

A. One team doesn’t answer with a TD and can be eliminated bc the opposing team gets a TD.

B. Time runs out

The players playing longer doesn’t matter. It’s OT. Win the game. It’s not like the NFL isn’t adding more games to the regular season anyway. At this rate we’ll have 20 regular season games by 2030.

**The Franchise** · 01-25-2022, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Keep going until either:

A. One team doesn’t answer with a TD and can be eliminated bc the opposing team gets a TD.

B. Time runs out

The players playing longer doesn’t matter. It’s OT. Win the game. It’s not like the NFL isn’t adding more games to the regular season anyway. At this rate we’ll have 20 regular season games by 2030.

Good luck getting a defensive stop in that scenario. Neither one of those defenses was going to get a stop in that game.

**TimBone** · 01-25-2022, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Keep going until either:

A. One team doesn’t answer with a TD and can be eliminated bc the opposing team gets a TD.

B. Time runs out

The players playing longer doesn’t matter. It’s OT. Win the game. It’s not like the NFL isn’t adding more games to the regular season anyway. At this rate we’ll have 20 regular season games by 2030.

You'd be good if the Chiefs had to play the equivalent of 2 or 3 overtime periods this week, and then go on to the Bengals next week (who already have an extra day's rest)?

staylor26 · 01-25-2022, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Keep going until either:

A. One team doesn’t answer with a TD and can be eliminated bc the opposing team gets a TD.

B. Time runs out

The players playing longer doesn’t matter. It’s OT. Win the game. It’s not like the NFL isn’t adding more games to the regular season anyway. At this rate we’ll have 20 regular season games by 2030.

I’ll just stop you right there. At what point is player health a concern?

The Chiefs deserved to lose in 2018. Buffalo deserved to lose Sunday.

The OT rules are fine the way they are. If Buffalo simply holds KC to a FG, they have a chance to go get the TD for the win.

You don’t even have to force the other team to punt. Simply hold them to a FG and you get your chance.

ToxSocks · 01-25-2022, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Keep going until either:

A. One team doesn’t answer with a TD and can be eliminated bc the opposing team gets a TD.

B. Time runs out

The players playing longer doesn’t matter. It’s OT. Win the game. It’s not like the NFL isn’t adding more games to the regular season anyway. At this rate we’ll have 20 regular season games by 2030.

You realize that there is an NFLPA, right? And contractual time obligations, right?

Like, games can't just go on forever. There's a reason sudden death was put in place in the first place.

Yeah, go ask the NFLPA how they'd feel about adding additional quarters to a game.

BWillie · 01-25-2022, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

You realize that there is an NFLPA, right? And contractual time obligations, right?

Like, games can't just go on forever. There's a reason sudden death was put in place in the first place.

Yeah, go ask the NFLPA how they'd feel about adding additional quarters to a game.

I think the 17th game is bullshit, but a fair overtime is a very small issue in the grand scheme of things as far as more football.

01-25-2022, 12:28 PM	#6
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $358880	I just don't understand why people think it's a guarantee TD on the first possession of OT. It's not and data proves it if you don't cherry pick. The Bills don't get an imaginary pretend TD drive fir a hypothetical coin toss loss just like KC in 19. Bills lost legitly end of story __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 72,931	2 0

01-25-2022, 12:43 PM	#8
Red Dawg Going home eventually Join Date: Dec 2002 Casino cash: $1422858	What a **ing stupid ing idea. Why not just play the game forever until we get the winner we want. Him and Pat Mac can go ** themselves in their pussies. The Bills had 60 minutes to win the game. In that time they failed. They had to keep us from completing a 75 yard drive to get a td and hold us to an FG. They failed to give themselves the ball back. The NFL didn't not fail to give them a second chance, they failed to give themselves a second chance. But Allen didn't his shot? Well, then he can blame himself for not having more points and winning outright or he can look to his left and blame the 11 guys that went full bitch in the OT. Whine like pussies all you want Bills fans. Life isn't fair. __________________ If you're not first you're last!
Posts: 33,099	1 0