Chiefs Chiefs Sign WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling - Page 26

Dante84 · 03-24-2022, 01:51 PM

More to come

The #Chiefs are signing former #Packers WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling to a three-year, $30 million deal with $18 million in the first two years and incentives to reach a maximum of $36 million, his agents @NSAFootball tell @RapSheet and me. ��
— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) March 24, 2022

Vid Links below

Spoiler!

RAS Score from college:

Spoiler!

splatbass · 03-24-2022, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoneix

I can’t tell if this football board is more interested in talking football, hurling insults at each other or talking about gay butt stuff. Y’all are crazy.

Are you new here?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

splatbass · 03-24-2022, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Is there a single person talking about this guy being a replacement for Hill?

I'm simply pointing out that he has an extremely low catch %. Much lower than any other receiver on the Packers that got a meaningful number of targets.

I haven't watched him play at all because I only watch Chiefs games and couldn't give a **** about watching any other team play until it's late in the playoffs. Maybe the issue was scheme, or maybe he's one of those speed guys that simply dont get separation on anything but a go route.

Why do you guys keep ignoring that he had ZERO drops last year? Cherry picking stats that help your case while ignoring more recent and thus more relevant stats that don’t is dishonest.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Phoneix · 03-24-2022, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

Are you new here?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

👀

Phoneix · 03-24-2022, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razaele

I like what we're doing with Schuster and MVS, and maybe Shenault. Defenses adjusted to what we were doing, now we're adjusting to what they have done. These are guys who are still plus athletes and we still have a lot of speed on offense, but getting bigger and more physical players to move chains without needing to go over the top.

Amen sister, amen.

jd1020 · 03-24-2022, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

Why do you guys keep ignoring that he had ZERO drops last year? Cherry picking stats that help your case while ignoring more recent and thus more relevant stats that don’t is dishonest.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

How am I cherry picking stats to help my case? You don't even know what the **** my case is.

I'm not questioning his ability to ****ing catch the ball, idiot. I'm questioning his ability to get open on anything but a straight line route.

splatbass · 03-24-2022, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

How am I cherry picking stats to help my case? You don't even know what the **** my case is.

I'm not questioning his ability to ****ing catch the ball, idiot. I'm questioning his ability to get open on anything but a straight line route.

You said he has a low catch rate, but it was greatly improved last year.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

jd1020 · 03-24-2022, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass

You said he has a low catch rate, but it was greatly improved last year.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No it ****ing wasnt.

https://www.pro-football-reference.c...V/ValdMa00.htm

Tell me all about how greatly improved his catch % was from 2018-2020 compared to 2021.

CatfishBob2 · 03-24-2022, 10:24 PM

All the guys we're bringing in at WR somebody has to stick and take the majority of Hills touches. As long as they can catch the ball and move the chains I'm good. As it stands though the only guy with that one play can go to the house ability is Mecole.....I'm really hoping he can step up and take those targets

bigjosh · 03-24-2022, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Is there a single person talking about this guy being a replacement for Hill?

I'm simply pointing out that he has an extremely low catch %. Much lower than any other receiver on the Packers that got a meaningful number of targets.

I haven't watched him play at all because I only watch Chiefs games and couldn't give a **** about watching any other team play until it's late in the playoffs. Maybe the issue was scheme, or maybe he's one of those speed guys that simply dont get separation on anything but a go route.

He was used primarily on deep routes. I think i read somewhere today that 40% of his routes were deeper than 20 yards.

Its hard to rack up a high catch percentage when you are only targeted on deep contested passes.

I don’t know how he will be used here, but the chiefs liked him enough to give him more than one year.

Hammock Parties · 03-24-2022, 10:39 PM

As good as Tyreek was, he did not make Mahomes. Not even close.

Two of the greatest games Mahomes has EVER played, at home vs BAL and at OAK in 2019, were without Tyreek

Mahomes has already learned to play without Tyreek, (both physically and schematically) so he's going to be fine.

The yards might be a little harder to come by, but as long as Andy Reid is bringing in receivers that get open, Mahomes will find them. And he hasn't hit his peak yet.

**wazu** · 03-24-2022, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief

Pringle at 6 is dirt cheap? Vs MVS at 9?

It's better. Pringle is roughly equal in my opinion. Best would be neither and plug a rookie in there.

PattyFlakes · 03-24-2022, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu

It's better. Pringle is roughly equal in my opinion. Best would be neither and plug a rookie in there.

I’ll take the potential of MVS and a rookie. This signing is definitely not prohibiting Vatch from using a pick on a WR in the draft.

TEX · 03-24-2022, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties

As good as Tyreek was, he did not make Mahomes. Not even close.

Two of the greatest games Mahomes has EVER played, at home vs BAL and at OAK in 2019, were without Tyreek

Mahomes has already learned to play without Tyreek, (both physically and schematically) so he's going to be fine.

The yards might be a little harder to come by, but as long as Andy Reid is bringing in receivers that get open, Mahomes will find them. And he hasn't hit his peak yet.

IMO, Mahomes is going to miss Reek a great deal. In fact, I think a couple years down the line, we all will. In my opinion, trading Reek was a huge mistake. But, that's just me.

FloridaMan88 · 03-24-2022, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu

It's better. Pringle is roughly equal in my opinion. Best would be neither and plug a rookie in there.

The Chiefs are still going to draft a WR1 and likely another WR for depth.

And meanwhile they sign a veteran guy in MVS who is bigger than JuJu with almost Tyreek-caliber speed… not a bad upgrade from shitfest DRob.

**wazu** · 03-24-2022, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

The Chiefs are still going to draft a WR1 and likely another WR for depth.

And meanwhile they sign a veteran guy in MVS who is bigger than JuJu with almost Tyreek-caliber speed… not a bad upgrade from shitfest DRob.

He’s better than D-Rob. That’s the only nice thing I can say. Wish he had the same price tag D-Rob has had.

03-24-2022, 01:51 PM
Dante84 Tossed Salad & Scrambled Eggs Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: ATX & OPKS Casino cash: $-1938004 VARSITY	Chiefs Sign WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling More to come The #Chiefs are signing former #Packers WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling to a three-year, $30 million deal with $18 million in the first two years and incentives to reach a maximum of $36 million, his agents @NSAFootball tell @RapSheet and me. �� — Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) March 24, 2022 Vid Links below Spoiler! RAS Score from college: Spoiler!
Posts: 20,447

03-24-2022, 10:24 PM	#383
CatfishBob2 Starter Join Date: Jan 2018 Casino cash: $-689600	All the guys we're bringing in at WR somebody has to stick and take the majority of Hills touches. As long as they can catch the ball and move the chains I'm good. As it stands though the only guy with that one play can go to the house ability is Mecole.....I'm really hoping he can step up and take those targets
Posts: 768

03-24-2022, 10:39 PM	#385
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $930478	As good as Tyreek was, he did not make Mahomes. Not even close. Two of the greatest games Mahomes has EVER played, at home vs BAL and at OAK in 2019, were without Tyreek Mahomes has already learned to play without Tyreek, (both physically and schematically) so he's going to be fine. The yards might be a little harder to come by, but as long as Andy Reid is bringing in receivers that get open, Mahomes will find them. And he hasn't hit his peak yet. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 297,004	1 0