Skyy Moore - Page 5

Titty Meat · 03-23-2022, 07:52 PM

The #Chiefs, I’m told, are highly intrigued by Skyy Moore, the Western Michigan standout who had a tremendous combine performance.

Personally not impressed by him at all

kcbubb · 04-23-2022, 01:47 PM

Interesting. How would you group them? A, B & C…. What’s the tiers?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Agreed. And I'd have Watson over him (I think) as well. I mean at that point we're talking about, what, my 9th favorite WR prospect? Something like that anyway. Hell, as I start to run through names, he probably doesn't crack my top 10.

Wilson
Williams
Olave
Burks
London
Metchie
Dotson
Pickens
Tolbert
Austin
Watson
Pierce
Moore

That's all the way down at 13 (and yes, I recognize I'm probably the high man on Austin; just love that stop/start ability). And I see him far closer to guys being viewed as 3rd day possibilities like Wan'Dale Robinson, Romeo Doubs and Khalil Shakir than I do the first round guys.

Chris Meck · 04-23-2022, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife

Id take any of the top guys except:

Drake London - NO
Metchie = NO
Dotson = NO
Moore = NO

Whoa now.

One of these things is not like the others.

If you've got Williams on your board, you've got Metchie on your board. And you absolutely should.

If we get Metchie, I'm thrilled. And you would be too, very soon.

**chiefforlife** · 04-23-2022, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

Whoa now.

One of these things is not like the others.

If you've got Williams on your board, you've got Metchie on your board. And you absolutely should.

If we get Metchie, I'm thrilled. And you would be too, very soon.

Probably right. If the Chiefs draft him I will certainly defer to them and be excited.

Just watching the guys on that list some didnt do it for me but what do I know?

DJ's left nut · 04-25-2022, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

I would MOSTLY agree with your rankings, other than I'd have Pierce, Watson, and Pickens all together and right in front of Metchie.

and I do not understand why anyone thinks Drake London is such a great prospect. I think he's got BUST written all over him. Big, slow, plodding WR's that don't separate don't get me excited.

I'm pretty down on London personally as well. Ultimately I have him where I have him more as an acknowledgement that I could be wrong more than anything. A lot of fairly smart people don't see the lack of separation I do. They see more fluidity than I see. Hell, they see the guy as a possible top 5 pick and the nearest thing we've had to Julio Jones in awhile.

So I'm splitting the baby.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

Interesting. How would you group them? A, B & C…. What’s the tiers?

____________________
Wilson
Williams
Olave--------------First round tier
Burks
London
____________________

Metchie
Dotson-------Would be fine taking at 50; value at the back of 2
Pickens
____________________
Tolbert
Austin-------Would be okay at the back of 2, value in 3
Watson
____________________

Pierce
Moore-------3rd round picks

And ultimately some of these guys I think you could game a bit. I think Austin is more likely to all into the 3rd so if you want to take 2 complementary guys, target Tolbert at the back of 2 and hope for Austin to slip. Then again, Austin has the most unique skill set and Tolbert has some guys who are very similar to him in Pierce, Moore and even Watson. So if you have a plan for Austin, take him at the back of 2 and whatever of the 3 similar guys you have left on your board in 3.

And again, someone like London is ranked 'in a vacuum' and if he were there at the back of the 1st, I guess I'd gamble on him because of the tool set, but I don't love him as a prospect. I just have a hard time saying he ISN'T a 1st round talent.

DJ's left nut · 04-25-2022, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

Whoa now.

One of these things is not like the others.

If you've got Williams on your board, you've got Metchie on your board. And you absolutely should.

If we get Metchie, I'm thrilled. And you would be too, very soon.

Yeah, I think Metchie has unfairly fallen off the radar.

He is a PERFECT X receiver in this system. I mean just freaking built in a lab for the role. And he's right up there with those other guys but/for the injury, and I think he'll recover from that just fine.

Metchie is very possibly my favorite combination of athleticism and physicality in this draft. I think people are sleeping on him and I'd love to see us snap him up. He'll have a long career as a top shelf #2 WR and tick of 70-80 catch, 1,000 yard seasons like they're nothing during his prime.

staylor26 · 04-25-2022, 01:04 PM

.@WMU_Football WR Skyy Moore’s upside, as told from a lead NFL scout: “The more tape you watch, the more you like him. Former high school QB whose strong, compact frame allows him to break a ton of tackles. Can play in the slot and outside. He’s always open.”
— Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) April 25, 2022

DJ's left nut · 04-25-2022, 01:42 PM

Smoooooooooke screeeeeeeeen.

There's essentially zero tape out there on him so GMs are hyping him up because there's nothing readily available to call it obviously asinine. This is the guy they've picked as their sacrificial lamb this season in the hopes that the player they actually want slides.

kccrow · 04-25-2022, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Smoooooooooke screeeeeeeeen.

There's essentially zero tape out there on him so GMs are hyping him up because there's nothing readily available to call it obviously asinine. This is the guy they've picked as their sacrificial lamb this season in the hopes that the player they actually want slides.

So GMs just scour the interwebs for tape on players and don't have any scouts either? Come on DJ, they have all the tape they want on this kid.

Do you think Western Michigan is some community college in the sticks that have no tape on players? I mean, Corey Davis went 5th overall. Jason Babin went 27th overall. D'Wayne Eskridge and Greg Jennings were 2nd rounders in the 50's. Taylor Moton is a pretty good 2nd rounder. Chuk Okafor is starting as a 3rd rounder. Nah, no team would have tape on Skyy Moore, it's impossible.

Moore is damned good, especially on those shallow crossers and quick slants. If Eleby could make more than a single read, his stats would be insane. Don't matter, if KC doesn't pick him by 50 he probably gets taken by his friend in Mike Tomlin in Pittsburgh shortly after.

Chris Meck · 04-25-2022, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Yeah, I think Metchie has unfairly fallen off the radar.

He is a PERFECT X receiver in this system. I mean just freaking built in a lab for the role. And he's right up there with those other guys but/for the injury, and I think he'll recover from that just fine.

Metchie is very possibly my favorite combination of athleticism and physicality in this draft. I think people are sleeping on him and I'd love to see us snap him up. He'll have a long career as a top shelf #2 WR and tick of 70-80 catch, 1,000 yard seasons like they're nothing during his prime.

at 5'11", 187? I don't know about that. I think he's a perfect 'Z' with that speed.

JPH83 · 04-26-2022, 01:06 AM

[QUOTE=kccrow;16261683]So GMs just scour the interwebs for tape on players and don't have any scouts either? Come on DJ, they have all the tape they want on this kid.

Do you think Western Michigan is some community college in the sticks that have no tape on players? I mean, Corey Davis went 5th overall. Jason Babin went 27th overall. D'Wayne Eskridge and Greg Jennings were 2nd rounders in the 50's. Taylor Moton is a pretty good 2nd rounder. Chuk Okafor is starting as a 3rd rounder. Nah, no team would have tape on Skyy Moore, it's impossible.

Moore is damned good, especially on those shallow crossers and quick slants. If Eleby could make more than a single read, his stats would be insane. Don't matter, if KC doesn't pick him by 50 he probably gets taken by his friend in Mike Tomlin in Pittsburgh shortly after.[/QUOTE

Yep, he's far better than a lot are giving credit for. He doesn't wow at anything and for that reason I don't think he's bust-proof. But I'd be willing to bet his floor is pretty high.

staylor26 · 04-29-2022, 06:55 PM

This thread will be fun

Titty Meat · 04-29-2022, 09:46 PM

Well dayum

milkshock · 04-30-2022, 09:28 AM

lol the negativity dripping off this thread, compared to what people are saying about him now

La0laEsMia · 04-30-2022, 11:06 PM

To me, it seems like the Chiefs didn't want Pickens or Moore. If they did, they would have taken them at 50.

Titty Meat · 05-01-2022, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkshock

lol the negativity dripping off this thread, compared to what people are saying about him now

Eh if Andy says you can play WR then you can play. I see everyone talking about his speed it didn't particularly jump out at me in the videos I've seen but his route running looks good and his hands are damn good. If he's a constient 50 receptions 3-5 touchdown guy it's going to be hard to label the pick a bust

03-23-2022, 07:52 PM
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $-1062442	Skyy Moore The #Chiefs, I’m told, are highly intrigued by Skyy Moore, the Western Michigan standout who had a tremendous combine performance. Personally not impressed by him at all
Posts: 78,102

04-25-2022, 01:04 PM	#66
staylor26 In Search of a Life Join Date: Oct 2007 Casino cash: $-2000960	.@WMU_Football WR Skyy Moore’s upside, as told from a lead NFL scout: “The more tape you watch, the more you like him. Former high school QB whose strong, compact frame allows him to break a ton of tackles. Can play in the slot and outside. He’s always open.” — Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) April 25, 2022
Posts: 52,890

04-25-2022, 01:42 PM	#67
DJ's left nut Sauntering Vaguely Downwards Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbia, Mo Casino cash: $-740901	Smoooooooooke screeeeeeeeen. There's essentially zero tape out there on him so GMs are hyping him up because there's nothing readily available to call it obviously asinine. This is the guy they've picked as their sacrificial lamb this season in the hopes that the player they actually want slides. __________________ "If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags."
Posts: 66,803	0 1

04-26-2022, 01:06 AM	#70
JPH83 Veteran Join Date: Feb 2021 Casino cash: $-249600	[QUOTE=kccrow;16261683]So GMs just scour the interwebs for tape on players and don't have any scouts either? Come on DJ, they have all the tape they want on this kid. Do you think Western Michigan is some community college in the sticks that have no tape on players? I mean, Corey Davis went 5th overall. Jason Babin went 27th overall. D'Wayne Eskridge and Greg Jennings were 2nd rounders in the 50's. Taylor Moton is a pretty good 2nd rounder. Chuk Okafor is starting as a 3rd rounder. Nah, no team would have tape on Skyy Moore, it's impossible. Moore is damned good, especially on those shallow crossers and quick slants. If Eleby could make more than a single read, his stats would be insane. Don't matter, if KC doesn't pick him by 50 he probably gets taken by his friend in Mike Tomlin in Pittsburgh shortly after.[/QUOTE Yep, he's far better than a lot are giving credit for. He doesn't wow at anything and for that reason I don't think he's bust-proof. But I'd be willing to bet his floor is pretty high.
Posts: 4,360

04-29-2022, 06:55 PM	#71
staylor26 In Search of a Life Join Date: Oct 2007 Casino cash: $-2000960	This thread will be fun
Posts: 52,890

04-29-2022, 09:46 PM	#72
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $-1062442	Well dayum
Posts: 78,102

04-30-2022, 09:28 AM	#73
milkshock Journeyman Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: London Casino cash: $-554850	lol the negativity dripping off this thread, compared to what people are saying about him now
Posts: 3,343

04-30-2022, 11:06 PM	#74
La0laEsMia Rookie Join Date: Apr 2022 Casino cash: $-279500	To me, it seems like the Chiefs didn't want Pickens or Moore. If they did, they would have taken them at 50.
Posts: 24	1 0