Let's talk about the Bills

[TLO]

.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin

This just confirms what I’ve already thought. Reid doesn’t want this game near as bad as the fans do. Chiefs have proven they can beat Buffalo in the playoffs. They have proven they can beat the Bills in Buffalo (2020). This game just means a lot more for the Bills than it does for the Chiefs.

Reid is more interested in getting players fully healthy and having them ready to go for the second half of the season. If they win this game, great. But it’s not by any means a ‘must win’. Last weeks game (division opponent) was way more important.

From the Chiefs standpoint, I think the priority is win the AFC West first, then worry about the other stuff, but ultimately, do that and let the chips fall where they may.

We’re a seasoned post season team at this point. No since I’m playing guys that might risk further injury for a regular season that doesn’t really mean all that much in the grand scheme, except to fans, media talking heads and Monday morning ‘Power Rankings’.

[UChieffyBugger]

The Bills secondary has a rookie CB, a 7th round pick CB and a backup safety along with Poyer. So let's not act like they are the "legion of boom" guys. Also Spags can push Sneed to outside corner if needed and play Bush in the slot perhaps. Bottom line is Sneed, Reid, Thornhill and Watson, ALL STARTERS, will be the main guys on the field. If Williams plays then great..he's physically gifted and has great speed so we'll see.

We should know more about Trent playing or not if they decide to elevate Bootle tomorrow. The fact that Andy didn't totally rule him out suggests there's some hope still that he can play.

[KChiefs1]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sassy Squatch]

Welp, that's going to be a shit show in the secondary. Although Fenton has been so shit recently it might not matter all that much.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin

This just confirms what I’ve already thought. Reid doesn’t want this game near as bad as the fans do. Chiefs have proven they can beat Buffalo in the playoffs. They have proven they can beat the Bills in Buffalo (2020). This game just means a lot more for the Bills than it does for the Chiefs.

Reid is more interested in getting players fully healthy and having them ready to go for the second half of the season. If they win this game, great. But it’s not by any means a ‘must win’. Last weeks game (division opponent) was way more important.

From the Chiefs standpoint, I think the priority is win the AFC West first, then worry about the other stuff, but ultimately, do that and let the chips fall where they may.

We’re a seasoned post season team at this point. No sense in playing guys that might risk further injury for a regular season game that doesn’t really mean all that much in the grand scheme, except to fans, media talking heads and Monday morning ‘Power Rankings’.

Great post, and I agree 100%.

[JustDíqLix]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Bullshit. No teams have 4 CBs in their base defense.

You're completely talking out of your ass.

You clearly don’t know the Bills defense.

Their official depth chart even shows 4 CB starters.

[Tonic55]

Long time lurker, first time poster here. I decided to finally jump in because so many of you seem to be going into a shell and fearing the worst for Sunday. MAN UP!! We have the best qb to ever play the game who makes everyone around him better, ,on BOTH sides of the ball. It's about confidence from knowing what we can do because we've done it before!!!!

[Wallcrawler]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Williams/Watson/Sneed have the size, length and speed to run with those guys.

Have some goddamn faith.

This.

People seem to forget that the guys Allen torched last year aren't even on the team anymore.

Hughes won't be here to fall on his face, Baker isn't here to be roasted, Ward left to go to the Niners. Sorensen isnt here for his 49 to flash In full neon colors as the weak spot.

Hitchens and Niemanns slow asses are gone.

This is nowhere close to the shitshow we fielded in the divisional round.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by JustRyan

You clearly don’t know the Bills defense.

Their official depth chart even shows 4 CB starters.

So according to that list, the Bills have 13 starters!

Chiefs might as well just not even play. Hard to win when it's 11 on 13!

Again, you don't know what the definition of the word "starter" is.

Hint: every team only has 11 on each side of the ball.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler

This.

People seem to forget that the guys Allen torched last year aren't even on the team anymore.

Hughes won't be here to fall on his face, Baker isn't here to be roasted, Ward left to go to the Niners. Sorensen 8snt here for his 49 to flash In full neon colors as the weak spit.

Hitchens and Niemanns slow asses are gone.

This is nowhere close to the shitshow we fielded in the divisional round.

Ward is a good corner and we'd be a better defense with him here right now. He's the guy who's been giving Diggs all he could handle in these matchups and part of why Diggs' numbers haven't been great against us. So put some 'spect on Ward's name.

But to the rest of your post....Yes. Exactly.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by JustRyan

You clearly don’t know the Bills defense.

Their official depth chart even shows 4 CB starters.

Wow. That may be one of the dumbest things I've ever seen posted on here.

[Tonic55]

[JustDíqLix]

Originally Posted by staylor26

So according to that list, the Bills have 13 starters!

Chiefs might as well just not even play. Hard to win when it's 11 on 13!

Again, you don't know what the definition of the word "starter" is.

Hint: every team only has 11 on each side of the ball.

No because the WLB leaves the field on Nickel.

Player A plays 50 snaps
Play B plays 50 snaps

Player A is on the field on the first play.
Player B is on the field on the second play.

The only difference is the first play.

If you want to “win” on semantics, have at it. But the point remains.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by JustRyan

Player A plays 50 snaps
Play B plays 50 snaps

Player A is on the field on the first play.
Player B is on the field on the second play.

The only difference is the first play.

If you want to “win” on semantics, have at it. But the point remains.

Again, you can't claim that you have 13 starters.

Not my fault that you don't understand basic football terms.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by JustRyan

No because the WLB leaves the field on Nickel.

Player A plays 50 snaps
Play B plays 50 snaps

Player A is on the field on the first play.
Player B is on the field on the second play.

The only difference is the first play.

If you want to “win” on semantics, have at it. But the point remains.

I mean...."starter" has a very clear and direct meaning. Seems to me you're the one playing semantics games.