ATTN: Any visitors that are upset about Bradberry's holding penalty and the refs.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Razaele

On replay you could see that when he regained control his left foot was still down, so he did get 2 feet.

I dont have issue with that call. I said in the game thread that it was close and I wouldnt be surprised if it wasn't overturned, only to be called blind.

That doesn't change the fact that the play in question was less of a questionable catch than that one.

c. after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take an additional step, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so.

Caught the ball, both feet down, turns up field and even appears to have got his third foot down, if a toe counts, as it clearly does, before the ball comes out. It was ruled a catch and fumble on the field and referees that didn't make the call overturned it.