|
|
View Poll Results: How do you assess this trade? | |||
The Chiefs decisively won this trade. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 43.48% |
The Chiefs won this trade, but both teams made out well. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 43.48% |
More or less a push. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 13.04% |
The Ravens got the better of the Chiefs here. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Some other option. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#3 | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $2103447
|
Quote:
I think you could say the Chiefs win this trade if you just had Brown vs. the listed Ravens players (minus Roquan Smith, who I don't think deserves to be included in the OP, but was for completism's sake). I have been different than the consensus: I think OBJ was a good tackle for us (which is why losing him to our biggest rival for cheaper is a bigger blow than ChiefsPlanet gives it credit for). A Pro Bowl left tackle for two years, especially once Mahomes figured out how to navigate the pocket with his blocking style. Once that happened, Mahomes became an MVP and Super Bowl MVP. Balance that against a good DE, a just-now-starting guard, and a reserve tight end... and I think that's a win for the Chiefs. Add a Pro Bowl caliber linebacker who was our best defender in the Super Bowl? And it's a slam dunk that the Chiefs came out ahead. Add in Mike Hughes, who played at a decent clip for a season. I think the only thing that balances is out is (a.) your willingness to include Roquan Smith in the calculations, and (b.) how much you weigh the length of impact. The OBJ trade's impact is mostly very short: two seasons. Bolton will be outstanding for a decade, however. Meanwhile Oweh, Cleveland, and Smith will all be major contributors in Baltimore for as long as Baltimore pays them. They should all have lengthy careers. |
|
Posts: 59,688
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|