Rashee Rice suspected in connection with major accident in Dallas

[Paniero]

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crim...ent-in-dallas/

[Fansy the Famous Bard]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni

Lying is the one thing that will get him in the most trouble so doing that isn't the worst thing. At this point they know he was there anyway may as well come clean and deal with what he deserves to deal with. Actions have consequences.

That's not how our justice system works.

[FloridaMan88]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni

Lying is the one thing that will get him in the most trouble so doing that isn't the worst thing. At this point they know he was there anyway may as well come clean and deal with what he deserves to deal with. Actions have consequences.

Just being there as a passenger is not a crime.

Until there is tangible evidence confirming he was driving one of the vehicles at the time of the crash, the police have nothing.

[scho63]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni

Lying is the one thing that will get him in the most trouble so doing that isn't the worst thing. At this point they know he was there anyway may as well come clean and deal with what he deserves to deal with. Actions have consequences.

Yeah, because that's what EVERYONE does when they get in trouble with the law. Hell, why even hire a lawyer? Just save the money and buy all his co-defendants $100 lunches.

Can you be anymore naive?

[JTB1974]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

Just being there as a passenger is not a crime.

Until there is tangible evidence confirming he was driving one of the vehicles at the time of the crash, the police have nothing.

Somebody had to be driving. The car didn't drive itself. If that is Rice's car and he was there, He is automatically responsible. Especially if nobody is going to confess to being the driver.

[FloridaMan88]

Originally Posted by JTB1974

Somebody had to be driving. The car didn't drive itself. If that is Rice's car and he was there, He is automatically responsible. Especially if nobody is going to confess to being the driver.

Are you aware there were three other people with him at the scene?

[ThaVirus]

Originally Posted by Kiimo

livestream of Rice's interaction with Texas highway patrol here:





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-opqUSOUDQY

I like this one better

[scho63]

Originally Posted by JTB1974

Somebody had to be driving. The car didn't drive itself. If that is Rice's car and he was there, He is automatically responsible. Especially if nobody is going to confess to being the driver.

Some of the takes in this thread are ridiculous. Do you know how many traffic and security cameras there are these days?

They should easily be able to pull camera shots to determine who was behind the wheel.

You never got a camera ticket have you? I have and there was NO DOUBT I was driving.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by scho63

Some of the takes in this thread are ridiculous. Do you know how many traffic and security cameras there are these days?

They should easily be able to pull camera shots to determine who was behind the wheel.

You never got a camera ticket have you? I have and there was NO DOUBT I was driving.

The entire thing is being blown way out of proportion. A few bumps and bruises and some insurance claims and civil law suits is all this is going to turn into along with some community service for the dipshits who walked away.

[Kiimo]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

I like this one better

someone voted down mine so you did better.

[DJ's left nut]

Has anyone checked in on orange shirt guy yet? I'm starting to get a little concerned for his well-being. It's possible that Rice and his crew have arranged a gangland style hit to take out the witnesses.

[raybec 4]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Has anyone checked in on orange shirt guy yet? I'm starting to get a little concerned for his well-being. It's possible that Rice and his crew have arranged a gangland style hit to take out the witnesses.

There was nothing that could be done. He's gone.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by JTB1974

Somebody had to be driving. The car didn't drive itself. If that is Rice's car and he was there, He is automatically responsible. Especially if nobody is going to confess to being the driver.

Civil case? Maybe. I'm not sure if there's a rebuttable presumption in a situation like that, but there are in many instances so it wouldn't surprise me.

In a criminal case? Nah - no chance. Simply being present during the wreck of a car you own isn't going to create a presumption that you were driving it. Rebuttable or otherwise. I doubt it would even be Constitutional to create a presumption like that in a criminal case.

In a civil one - who gives a shit? It ain't my money.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by raybec 4

There was nothing that cold be done. He's gone.

The guy that shot him was Michael Jackson's business manager. Pretty sure he'd been fired by the time he played Tuddy, but guy had a crazy decade or so in the 80s.

[el borracho]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni

Lying is the one thing that will get him in the most trouble so doing that isn't the worst thing. At this point they know he was there anyway may as well come clean and deal with what he deserves to deal with. Actions have consequences.

PSA: Never "come clean" to the police. Never tell the police anything. Never "come clean" to insurance companies. Never "come clean" to anyone who might have legitimate reason to sue you.

Keep your mouth shut; hire the best legal representation you can afford; say whatever they tell you to say and say nothing else.

[cmh6476]

so you all who were defending his vehicle purchase at his salary, still think paying $600k a year to lease a lambo is a smart investment?