|
|
View Poll Results: Did Veach fix our O-Line? | |||
The best he he could this off season |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
34 | 21.38% |
Could have been better but acceptable |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
54 | 33.96% |
Average |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41 | 25.79% |
Could have been better |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 15.09% |
Whatever Gaz says |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 3.77% |
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
Casino cash: $-1235090
|
Quote:
This means that EVERY year KC drafts #31 or #32. This means that DRAFTING a LT means a PROJECT. The problem is, they kind of have to play to DEVELOP. And that's the catch-22 there. You can't afford the growing pains because you're fighting for a championship EVERY year. OBJ had an inflated sense of self-worth. He wanted more than his market value, Veach wouldn't go that far and he eventually signed for LESS in Cincinnati out of spite. Now, maybe you think Veach should have just given him whatever he wanted, but I think that sets a shitty precedent. We won a Super Bowl with Smith since then. Burrow's missed an entire season to injury. So I guess maybe Cincinnati's approach to the offensive line hasn't been so great, right? Burrow's missed almost two entire seasons. In either of THOSE off-seasons, Cinci could have probably drafted a legit LT. We don't have seasons with shitty records, so we don't really have that option. |
|
Posts: 19,439
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|