|
|
View Poll Results: ??? | |||
Blind Homer Time ... Under 50 yrds |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 5.83% |
keeping it Positive 50-100 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 37.86% |
Same ol, Same ol 100-150 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 33.98% |
not pretty 150-200 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 8.74% |
Another Hall of famer is born 200-250 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 5.83% |
holy #$%^!!!! 250+ |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 7.77% |
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 | |||
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $8069900
|
Quote:
![]() Not enough carries to make an adequate assessment? That's good enough to explain away Foster's mediocre numbers? Are you sure that's not an excuse? Foster's rookie season: zero carries, zero yards, zero rushing TD's, active for ZERO games Foster's career: 116 carries, 441 yards, zero TD's, 3.8 ypc The rookie season of the biggest bust in recent Chiefs memory: 20 carries, 85 yards, 1 TD, 4.3 ypc I sense a double standard here. Quote:
Foster's "homerun capability" up to this point, is non-existent, and as I said before, he's played several bad run defenses, including Indy and Houston, who was WORSE than us last season. Quote:
|
|||
Posts: 104,482
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|