Double-teamed or not, this is absolutely pathetic...

shaneo69 · 09-20-2004, 12:06 PM

from KCStar.com...

Defense T A Tot.
Beisel 10 2 12
Fujita 6 4 10
Barber 7 1 8
Browning 4 3 7
Woods 4 2 6
Warfield 5 0 5
Dalton 3 0 3
McCleon 2 0 2
Pile 2 0 2
Bartee 2 0 2
Siavii 2 0 2
Hicks 2 0 2
Allen 1 0 1
Wilkerson 1 0 1
Totals 51 12 63

Anybody see Sims on this list?

**ChiTown** · 09-20-2004, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaneo69

from KCStar.com...

Defense T A Tot.
Beisel 10 2 12
Fujita 6 4 10
Barber 7 1 8
Browning 4 3 7
Woods 4 2 6
Warfield 5 0 5
Dalton 3 0 3
McCleon 2 0 2
Pile 2 0 2
Bartee 2 0 2
Siavii 2 0 2
Hicks 2 0 2
Allen 1 0 1
Wilkerson 1 0 1
Totals 51 12 63

Anybody see Sims on this list?

Look, maybe you didn't hear. Sims was double teamed, dude. He's the only LDT in the history of the game to be DT'd. He took one for the team, and sacrificed his stats. He's worth his weight in gold, seriously.........

GoTrav · 09-20-2004, 12:13 PM

have a list of missed tackles?

Spicy McHaggis · 09-20-2004, 12:13 PM

He is? Man and all this time I thought he was an underachiever. I bet I was misled by all Whitlocks columns.

Cannibal · 09-20-2004, 12:14 PM

I made a point to watch his sorry ass quite often yesterday.

He sucked big dong all game long.

KC Jones · 09-20-2004, 12:21 PM

I'm not going to say Sims is bad or good, but you really can't read too much into tackling totals to determine whether or not someone played well. If a DT shut down his lane, collapsed the pocket, and kept O-linemen off of the LBs then he did his job. Maybe not at the level you want of a 6th overall pick, but that's generally what you want out of a DT. Now I can't really say that I remember much good from Sims yesterday, but I remember being much more dissapointed in McCleon and Barber.

oldandslow · 09-20-2004, 12:22 PM

Damn...

Even tho I hate it, I have to give props to Big Sexy on this one.

Perhaps his vision is less biased than DV.

I really wish Minnesota had their crap together during that draft.....

**The Bad Guy** · 09-20-2004, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Jones

I'm not going to say Sims is bad or good, but you really can't read too much into tackling totals to determine whether or not someone played well. If a DT shut down his lane, collapsed the pocket, and kept O-linemen off of the LBs then he did his job. Maybe not at the level you want of a 6th overall pick, but that's generally what you want out of a DT. Now I can't really say that I remember much good from Sims yesterday, but I remember being much more dissapointed in McCleon and Barber.

When you give up 180 yards rushing in two games, then your defensive tackles aren't worth shit. They aren't doing their jobs if you're getting run all over.

shaneo69 · 09-20-2004, 12:26 PM

Meanwhile, freakin' John Henderson is starring for the team who last year was 2nd in the league against the run and just held Q. Griffin to 2.6 yards per carry. And they have no DE's either.

KC Jones · 09-20-2004, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

When you give up 180 yards rushing in two games, then your defensive tackles aren't worth shit. They aren't doing their jobs if you're getting run all over.

Now that's a valid statistic to use for that argument. The tackling stats are not.

FWIW - I thought the defense played pretty stellar in the first half. It was that 9 minutes of hell drive in the 3rd quarter that blew it all to hell. After that they were dog tired and seemed to have lost their confidence. I'll add that they did a decent job of stopping the run in that drive, but on repeated 3rd and longs DelHomme picked us apart. I'm much more concered about our CBs and LBs than our DTs. Barber and Dex on the same side of the field was like having a double bonus for Carolina.

tonyetony · 09-20-2004, 12:32 PM

When you give up 180 yards rushing in two games, then your defensive tackles aren't worth shit. They aren't doing their jobs if you're getting run all over.

Not If They're doing it to the outside. Thats where the majority of rushing yards agaist us are coming from.

Mr. Laz · 09-20-2004, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaneo69

from KCStar.com...

Defense T A Tot.
Beisel 10 2 12

in his 2nd game as a MLB ...

not bad, i hope he continues to improve

tonyetony · 09-20-2004, 12:36 PM

Barber and Dex on the same side of the field was like having a double bonus for Carolina.

I agree completely! And those of you who don't, watch the game again like I did.

tonyetony · 09-20-2004, 12:40 PM

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by shaneo69
from KCStar.com...

Defense T A Tot.
Beisel 10 2 12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Damn near equals Kwikas Stats from all of 2003.
I am not giving up on him.

**Lzen** · 09-20-2004, 01:13 PM

I don't understand why everyone is picking on Barber. I heard the guy on 610 this morning saying Barber has never done anything for the Chiefs. IIRC, he played pretty well in the playoff loss. He was the only bright spot on defense that day. And he got 8 tackles yesterday. Maybe I need to watch him more cause I haven't noticed him being that bad.

And Monte Beisel has played better than we could have expected, IMO.

09-20-2004, 12:06 PM
shaneo69 Smug Weasel Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bleachers at Busch Casino cash: $10004900	Double-teamed or not, this is absolutely pathetic... from KCStar.com... Defense T A Tot. Beisel 10 2 12 Fujita 6 4 10 Barber 7 1 8 Browning 4 3 7 Woods 4 2 6 Warfield 5 0 5 Dalton 3 0 3 McCleon 2 0 2 Pile 2 0 2 Bartee 2 0 2 Siavii 2 0 2 Hicks 2 0 2 Allen 1 0 1 Wilkerson 1 0 1 Totals 51 12 63 Anybody see Sims on this list?
Posts: 4,910

09-20-2004, 12:13 PM	#3
GoTrav Veteran Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lee's Summit, MO Casino cash: $10004900	have a list of missed tackles?
Posts: 1,018

09-20-2004, 12:13 PM	#4
Spicy McHaggis Keep 'er Movin' Join Date: Sep 2004 Casino cash: $9905359	He is? Man and all this time I thought he was an underachiever. I bet I was misled by all Whitlocks columns.
Posts: 4,963

09-20-2004, 12:14 PM	#5
Cannibal Better to burn out... Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Bible Thumping Country Casino cash: $10010618	I made a point to watch his sorry ass quite often yesterday. He sucked big dong all game long.
Posts: 9,306

09-20-2004, 12:21 PM	#6
KC Jones Genious Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Colorado Casino cash: $10012761	I'm not going to say Sims is bad or good, but you really can't read too much into tackling totals to determine whether or not someone played well. If a DT shut down his lane, collapsed the pocket, and kept O-linemen off of the LBs then he did his job. Maybe not at the level you want of a 6th overall pick, but that's generally what you want out of a DT. Now I can't really say that I remember much good from Sims yesterday, but I remember being much more dissapointed in McCleon and Barber. __________________ re-sign: to sign again resign: to withdraw from employment
Posts: 5,366

09-20-2004, 12:22 PM	#7
oldandslow Veteran Join Date: Apr 2004 Casino cash: $3753149	Damn... Even tho I hate it, I have to give props to Big Sexy on this one. Perhaps his vision is less biased than DV. I really wish Minnesota had their crap together during that draft.....
Posts: 4,621

09-20-2004, 12:26 PM	#9
shaneo69 Smug Weasel Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bleachers at Busch Casino cash: $10004900	Meanwhile, freakin' John Henderson is starring for the team who last year was 2nd in the league against the run and just held Q. Griffin to 2.6 yards per carry. And they have no DE's either.
Posts: 4,910

09-20-2004, 12:32 PM	#11
tonyetony tonyetony Join Date: May 2001 Location: Yeah Right! Casino cash: $9977948	When you give up 180 yards rushing in two games, then your defensive tackles aren't worth shit. They aren't doing their jobs if you're getting run all over. Not If They're doing it to the outside. Thats where the majority of rushing yards agaist us are coming from.
Posts: 1,446

09-20-2004, 12:36 PM	#13
tonyetony tonyetony Join Date: May 2001 Location: Yeah Right! Casino cash: $9977948	Barber and Dex on the same side of the field was like having a double bonus for Carolina. I agree completely! And those of you who don't, watch the game again like I did.
Posts: 1,446

09-20-2004, 12:40 PM	#14
tonyetony tonyetony Join Date: May 2001 Location: Yeah Right! Casino cash: $9977948	Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally Posted by shaneo69 from KCStar.com... Defense T A Tot. Beisel 10 2 12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Damn near equals Kwikas Stats from all of 2003. I am not giving up on him.
Posts: 1,446

09-20-2004, 01:13 PM	#15
Lzen Banded Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Oz Casino cash: $-639308	I don't understand why everyone is picking on Barber. I heard the guy on 610 this morning saying Barber has never done anything for the Chiefs. IIRC, he played pretty well in the playoff loss. He was the only bright spot on defense that day. And he got 8 tackles yesterday. Maybe I need to watch him more cause I haven't noticed him being that bad. And Monte Beisel has played better than we could have expected, IMO. __________________ Conversation would be vastly improved by the constant use of four simple words: I do not know.
Posts: 42,478