The Pope John Paul II

[Miles]

Originally Posted by gochiefs

Actually, I'm not kidding. But you say carbon dating disproves the seven days thing? How is that?

Yeah I though carbon dating had a decent margin of error.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by Miles

I though carbon dating had a decent margin of error.

Not in the billions.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Miles

Yeah I though carbon dating had a decent margin of error.

I'm not even trying to dispute it...I'm just ignorant of how the whole carbon dating thing works.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by gochiefs

I'm not even trying to dispute it...I'm just ignorant of how the whole carbon dating thing works.

Google it.

[Miles]

Originally Posted by gochiefs

I'm not even trying to dispute it...I'm just ignorant of how the whole carbon dating thing works.

Pretty much the same here. I roughly undertand the whole decay thing but im not really a sience type. From watching history channel type stuff it seems its somewhat accurate at least.

[Herzig]

Originally Posted by Miles

Pretty much the same here. I roughly undertand the whole decay thing but im not really a sience type. From watching history channel type stuff it seems its somewhat accurate at least.

Without googling it...being a science teacher myself....I can tell you that Carbon Dating involves a process where a Carbon-14 isotope is compared to the decay rate of the item in question....or something like that..

I only teach six grade science and I barely touch on the subject of isotopes.

[C-Mac]

Originally Posted by Herzig

Without googling it...being a science teacher myself....I can tell you that Carbon Dating involves a process where a Carbon-14 isotope is compared to the decay rate of the item in question....or something like that..

I only teach six grade science and I barely touch on the subject of isotopes.

Carbon dating acuracy is also is limited to a few thousand years.
As far as the 7 creation days.
While the fossil record proves creation, it disproves creation in the "literal" 6 creation days.

[Clint in Wichita]

Originally Posted by C-Mac

Carbon dating acuracy is also is limited to a few thousand years.

Wrong. Items dating back millions of years are routinely dated. There is a reasonable margin of error, of course, but it is clear that the Earth is several billion years old, at least.

Originally Posted by C-Mac

While the fossil record proves creation, it disproves creation in the "literal" 6 creation days.

The fossil record proves creation AND disproves creation in 6 days?

I don't even know where to begin.

Another mind deluded by religion.

[InChiefsHeaven]

Originally Posted by Clint in Wichita

Wrong. Items dating back millions of years are routinely dated. There is a reasonable margin of error, of course, but it is clear that the Earth is several billion years old, at least.




The fossil record proves creation AND disproves creation in 6 days?

I don't even know where to begin.

Another mind deluded by religion.

Clint is such a nice guy...

[C-Mac]

Originally Posted by Clint in Wichita

Wrong. Items dating back millions of years are routinely dated. There is a reasonable margin of error, of course, but it is clear that the Earth is several billion years old, at least.

The fossil record proves creation AND disproves creation in 6 days?

I don't even know where to begin.

Another mind deluded by religion.

-I was speaking of its acuracy.
-There is no doubt that the earth is millions of years old.
-I dont know, the layers of sediment show no signs of life then all of a sudden... wala there's whole life forms. I suppose the fossil record can be altered by athiests.