I've got a question for the Raiders fans.

[easymobee]

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave

Keep one thing in mind. The Vikings were 8-8 last season with Moss and a better O-line and QB...

And the Chiefs finished 7-9 with an even Better O-Line + Priest Holmes - Larry Johnson + Trent Green (Surely you'd rate him better than Kerry Collins ???)

The Bottom Line being that all 3 D's were horrible.

The Raiders have more to work with defensively IMO (Currently on Roster) than the Chiefs or Vikes right now .... and last i looked are also able to sign-draft defensive players this offseason.

Charles Woodson + Phillip Buchanon > Vikes DB's (A. Winfield etc) >>> Chiefs DB's ( Warfield etc ...)

Sapp + Washington + Brayton > Vikes D-Line ( Even with K. Williams ) >>> Chiefs D-Line (Hicks, Dalton, Sims, Allen).

Vikes have a better LB corps than either the Raiders and espescially the Chiefs .....


I hate to defend the Raders, BUT it looks to me like Chief fans are tryng to create a feeling of Resentment in Raderland for no reason ( Best WR in the NFL + Resigning Porter who was many a Chief fans wet dream + Signing the best FA RB on the Board ... All by Day 1 ).

What has KC Done so far ?? Other than stock the wet-bar in a few Limos ..........