Voyager Says;

Mr. Kotter · 03-03-2005, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nmt1

Don't misunderstand my statements. I agree that the Chiefs will sign someone to play MLB. I just think it would be really amusing to see Mitchell beat out whoever they brought in.

You know, if they bring in Hartwell....and that happens, Hartwell immediately becomes the other Will LB...

I could live with that, IF it is because Mitchell has improved that much.

nmt1 · 03-03-2005, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

You know, if they bring in Hartwell....and that happens, Hartwell immediately becomes the other Will LB... :hmmm:

I could live with that, IF it is because Mitchell has improved that much. :)

If Mitchell improves that much, we'll definitly be in a great position. I'm not counting on it by any means.

Mr. Kotter · 03-03-2005, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nmt1

If Mitchell improves that much, we'll definitly be in a great position. I'm not counting on it by any means.

I could be wrong, but by the END of the year....I think Gun was happy with Fujita, and intrigued by Mitchell's "progress." If nothin' else, he'd be an experienced, and quality backup to either Hartwell or Trotter.

nmt1 · 03-03-2005, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

I could be wrong, but by the END of the year....I think Gun was happy with Fujita, and intrigued by Mitchell's "progress." If nothin' else, he'd be an experienced, and quality backup to either Hartwell or Trotter.

Mitchell will be the backup to whoever they're able to sign, if anyone. Gun has said on several occasions that it takes him several years to get his LB's to play like he wants them. Our guys have one season under their belts.