Sub-forum decision

penchief · 09-10-2005, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader

Actually, it is you who are not taking into account "recorded posterity" of that forum, despite the fact I have explained it to you. You simply choose to ignore it (can you say "unilateral"?).

When you say -

It kind of sounds like you are questioning his integrity. You make it sound like he is determined to side against a certain group inspite of whatever "truth" you show him. That sounds like a case of integrity to me.

I respect htismaqe.

Please don't attempt to insinutate that I am trying to question his integrity. You are trying to stir up shit where it doesn't exist.

Stop it.

Raiderhater · 09-10-2005, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief

I respect htismaqe.

Please don't attempt to insinutate that I am trying to question his integrity. You are trying to stir up shit where it doesn't exist.

Stop it.

No I am not. I am reading your words, pure and simple. You accuse him of purposely coming down on one side inspite of your irrelevant "proof".

If your "proof" were relevant, you'd have case (though you would still be questiong his integrity in the matter).

Wether or not it is your intention, you are questioning his integrity.

penchief · 09-10-2005, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader

No I am not. I am reading your words, pure and simple. You accuse him of purposely coming down on one side inspite of your irrelevant "proof".

If your "proof" were relevant, you'd have case (though you would still be questiong his integrity in the matter).

Wether or not it is your intention, you are questioning his integrity.

I'll agree that this could be perceived as questioning someone's position but I'm not sure that it goes so far as disrespecting someone by questioning their integrity. See for yourself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief

Generally, I would agree that htismaqe is fair. However, in this particular instance he seems intent on coming down in the middle of a specific debate in which one side's argument is not supported by historical evidence.

If this is an example of what you purport to be questioning someone's integrity then I would suggest that there isn't a soul on the DC Planet that hasn't questioned another's integrity.

Raiderhater · 09-10-2005, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief

I'll agree that this could be perceived as questioning someone's position but I'm not sure that it goes so far as disrespecting someone by questioning their integrity. See for yourself.

If this is an example of what you purport to be questioning someone's integrity then I would suggest that there isn't a soul on the DC Planet that hasn't questioned another's integrity.

Oh hell, it happens on here all the time. And that may not be the best example, let's try this one -

Quote:

Granted, both sides have their problems, but by expressing the above opinion maybe you are exposing your true affiliation. Not saying it's so but maybe you aren't all that neutral, after all.

That does not exactly sound like you think he is the most intellectually honest person......

Logical · 09-10-2005, 08:07 PM

Funny thing is I don't see anybody posting being all that childish but the voters sure are.

I see a bunch of posters that want to see one of two things happen, the DC Forum to survive (Penchief, Laz, and myself mainly) and a whole bunch of people early that clearly wanted to see it die (and then Jamie 55+ times that late). There are a few moderators that have mixed in their thoughts or jokes but in general the mods have kept it low key. Not sure why Parker feels anyone is being childish honestly as far as posting goes.

htismaqe · 09-10-2005, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Funny thing is I don't see anybody posting being all that childish but the voters sure are.

I see a bunch of posters that want to see one of two things happen, the DC Forum to survive (Penchief, Laz, and myself mainly) and a whole bunch of people early that clearly wanted to see it die (and then Jamie 55+ times that late). There are a few moderators that have mixed in their thoughts or jokes but in general the mods have kept it low key. Not sure why Parker feels anyone is being childish honestly as far as posting goes.

THIS is what I feel is childish.

Do you know, for a fact, that ALL people that voted to move DC are conservatives?

And even if they are, are you 100% certain that their motive is to make it "go away" because they're no longer winning?

This whole "I'm taking my ball and going home because the libs are winning" argument was MADE UP by the libs because they want to rub it in and now there's nobody there...

Mr. Laz · 09-10-2005, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

This whole "I'm taking my ball and going home because the libs are winning" argument was MADE UP by the libs

and you know this how? because the libs pissed you off the most?

sorry ... but when can we tell when you making your decision based on information germain to the situation or when it's being made because somebody pissed you off?

check the circumstantial evidence ... it supports the theory of the "I'm taking my ball and going home" theorists.

Logical · 09-10-2005, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

THIS is what I feel is childish.

Do you know, for a fact, that ALL people that voted to move DC are conservatives?

And even if they are, are you 100% certain that their motive is to make it "go away" because they're no longer winning?

This whole "I'm taking my ball and going home because the libs are winning" argument was MADE UP by the libs because they want to rub it in and now there's nobody there...

Of course there is no way to know for sure, but I base my interpoloation on the comments from the conservatives in the first 300 posts. It may not be 100% but I actually would be willing to put 100 bucks on it being 90%+

Raiderhater · 09-10-2005, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Funny thing is I don't see anybody posting being all that childish but the voters sure are.

I see a bunch of posters that want to see one of two things happen, the DC Forum to survive (Penchief, Laz, and myself mainly) and a whole bunch of people early that clearly wanted to see it die (and then Jamie 55+ times that late). There are a few moderators that have mixed in their thoughts or jokes but in general the mods have kept it low key. Not sure why Parker feels anyone is being childish honestly as far as posting goes.

You might be surprised to learn that I haven't even voted. Early on I didn't give a flying fuck which sub-forum was moved. And in all honestly, it still is not THAT important to me. I see potential good and bad from the DC forum being moved, but no matter how it turns out I know that she will still be amongst us, so I am damned no matter what.

I just like arguing for the sake of arguing.

Parker has explained more than once what he views as childish in this subject. You fail to grasp it because your opions have changed and as such you view the left's opinions of the right hiding as correct because they do not see, or fail to admit to seeing what you do. The childish behaviour in this thread ranges from silly and conspiratorial accusations, to my little joke earlier, to anyone on the right engaging these stupid notions (mostly me), to the fact that there may be a few on the right who actually want the forum gone for the conspiratorial reasons given by the left.

Mr. Laz · 09-10-2005, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader

You might be surprised to learn that I haven't even voted. Early on I didn't give a flying fuck which sub-forum was moved. And in all honestly, it still is not THAT important to me.

I just like arguing for the sake of arguing

parker ... can i get a "childish ruling" here?

Stinger · 09-10-2005, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Again to the moderators I am sorry, I am talking about the intent of the voters not the intent of the moderators.

Oh lord he we go with voter intent, seems to me this board had this discussion back in November of 2000.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Funny thing is I don't see anybody posting being all that childish but the voters sure are.
.

So you can decipher what everones vote ment to them. That is truely amazing. If someone came up with a hanging chad ruling this thread would be the 2000 election in a nutshell.

penchief · 09-10-2005, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader

Oh hell, it happens on here all the time. And that may not be the best example, let's try this one -

That does not exactly sound like you think he is the most intellectually honest person......

I respect the opinions of those who disagree with me. My suggesting that he has an ulterior opinion does not mean that I am questioning his integrity.

In fact, I prefer that he tells me how he feels. Even using my words that you quoted, I tried to be as respectful as I could. I think you are running out of my words to present your case.

htismaqe · 09-10-2005, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief

I respect the opinions of those who diametrically agree with me. My suggesting that he has an ulterior opinion does not mean that I am questioning his integrity.

In fact, I prefer that he tells me how he feels. Even using my words that you quoted, I tried to be as respectful as I could. I think you are running out of my words to present your case.

I have no ulterior motive nor do I think you are questioning my integrity.

You feel that I'm arguing with you because I've traditionally come out on the side of conservatives and you're a liberal.

In reality, I'm arguing with you because you appear to be the only one here whining about the DC forum.

See my previous post.

View Poll Results: Which sub-forum to move?
D.C.	55	37.67%
Pictures	11	7.53%
GeeksPlanet	19	13.01%
PlanetStore	33	22.60%
Don't move any. Just add the games forum to the top.	21	14.38%
Remove all the sub-forums. Move them elsewhere.	7	4.79%
Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll

09-10-2005, 08:07 PM	#5
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Funny thing is I don't see anybody posting being all that childish but the voters sure are. I see a bunch of posters that want to see one of two things happen, the DC Forum to survive (Penchief, Laz, and myself mainly) and a whole bunch of people early that clearly wanted to see it die (and then Jamie 55+ times that late). There are a few moderators that have mixed in their thoughts or jokes but in general the mods have kept it low key. Not sure why Parker feels anyone is being childish honestly as far as posting goes.
Posts: 31,579