|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What Should the US Do Now | |||
| All Out Nuclear War against All Backers of Islamic Terrorism |
   
|
9 | 10.59% |
| Tactical Nuclear Strike Against Primary Offending Nation |
  
|
4 | 4.71% |
| Non-Nuke Full Scale Invasion/Conquering of Offending Nation |
  
|
32 | 37.65% |
| Massive Non Nuke Missile Strike of Offending Nation |
  
|
10 | 11.76% |
| Missile Strike plus Special Forces Attack |
  
|
24 | 28.24% |
| Special Forces Surgical Strike Only |
  
|
6 | 7.06% |
| Negotiate with Terrorists and Arab Leaders |
|
0 | 0% |
| Talk Tough and see what happens next |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-13-2001, 06:42 PM
|
#36 |
|
Did you hear what I said?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $-836615
|
Moving this back to the front page.
I must say that I am happy to see no votes for negotiating or blustering. I would also add that I've rethought my position on the tac nuke, and after calming down a bit (I was pretty pissed last night), realize that it would not be the smart move - too many people and countries whose support we will need in any action would be outraged and would at the least not help us. All I can say is that I'm a rather emotional guy, and have learned from hard experience that the initial, angry response is generally not the best one. If I could change my vote, I would - to large scale conventional attack followed by occupation. |
|
Posts: 121,794
  |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode