What was better? BCS or old system?

[Chief Chief]

Originally Posted by Mojo Rising

One way to have a true Champ is to take the top 4 teams and have them play in (1 vs 4) and (2 vs. 3.) The winners go to the BCS Champ game the following week.

They already have the newly created BCS Champ Game so it would work well. They would only have to add 1 game.

If you're #5 then you can complain all you want but you should have been ranked in the top 4. This can be accomplished by not losing, and scheduling a tough, non conference schedule.

Well..DUHH!! Under the current system, if you're #3 then you can complain all you want but you should have been ranked in the top 2. No matter how many teams you have in the tournament, there's always gonna be several teams left out who feel they should be included.

And just how does one go about scheduling a so-called "tough" schedule when games are lined up 5 or more years ahead of time? Who knows the quality of the 2011 team at USC, Ohio State, Notre Dame, Michigan, etc.? Who knew 5 years ago that Bobby Bowden and his 2006 FSU team would suck big-time?