|
|
![]() |
#1 |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $2033447
|
|
Posts: 59,693
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Don't Tease Me
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: KS
Casino cash: $11047037
|
Quote:
great college ..... not so much pro
__________________
|
|
Posts: 95,626
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Beloved & Awesome CP Celebrity
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Florida
Casino cash: $5584952
|
Quote:
Crouch's Heisman year (senior): 1510yds passing, 7TDs, 10ints, 134.31 efficiency rating, 55.6% completion% 1115yds rushing, 18TDs Tebow's Heisman year (sophomore): 3286yds passing, 32TDs, 6ints, 172.47 efficiency rating, 66.9% completion% 895yds rushing, 23TDs
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 35,714
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Feeling Victorian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Nebraska/Wyoming/Colorado
Casino cash: $-113564
|
Quote:
![]() You can't compare the two. If Crouch would have been smart he should of gone as a RB. Hell he probably would of stuck around St. Louis as a return guy alone.
__________________
It bears repeating, **** Herm, Pioli, Haley, and Crennel for ****ing up my franchise for a goddamn decade. Buehler 445 |
|
Posts: 33,983
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Beloved & Awesome CP Celebrity
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Florida
Casino cash: $5584952
|
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 35,714
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
FINALLY! The wait is over.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Future Is Now!!!
Casino cash: $19947565
|
The fact that he's not on the list hurts their credibility too me. I'm not saying the guy is going to be a gangbuster star in the NFL but to not have a guy with his stats on the radar at all in a weak year is stoopid. Let me clarify the stats part. He plays against some of the best teams in the country week in and week out. His stats aren't inflated against sub par competition.
|
Posts: 56,649
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|