|
|
![]() |
#1 |
testing ... 1, 2, 3
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tennessee
Casino cash: $6753759
|
Hmmm. Good debate, gentlemen. I'm very glad to see that you can discuss this matter without feeling the need for name-calling. There is hope for ChiefsPlanet, yet.
This raises a very interesting point, though. Obviously, in the USA, free speech is a protected right. However, does the owner of a particular property have the right to limit speech on his/her property? I mean, did Wal-Mart have the right to remove this lady from the premises based solely on her speech? If someone were to enter my place of business and use speech which I might find objectionable, do I have the right to remove that person for that reason and that reason only? FAX |
Posts: 44,492
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Champs!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Casino cash: $3708476
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Posts: 54,706
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
testing ... 1, 2, 3
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tennessee
Casino cash: $6753759
|
Quote:
In this situation, I can't see that the fire marshall man did anything wrong. If he felt the need to give her a ticket, so be it. Let a judge figure it out. However, that isn't really my question. My question has to do with the right of Wal-Mart (the owner of the property, in this case) to remove a person based solely on their speech. I honestly don't know the answer to this. I assume speech is viewed as a form of behavior ... maybe. FAX |
|
Posts: 44,492
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|