|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: manhattan beach, CA
Casino cash: $9688215
|
you know what more people would be willing to communicate on here if jerks like you didn't blast them for putting an opinion up an opinion isn't wrong because you think it is.
first of all take off the rose colored glasses this team stinks and we need to get better we traded our best DE what makes you think we won't trade our best two bargaining chips? by the way LJ was offered for Quinn so your talk they won't trade LJ is blown right there Tony Gonzalez is our best chip to play we all love him but know he is on the decline by the time we are any good. It's time to wake up and smell the coffee we aren't good and we need draft picks this is a good draft. Why don't you analyze that instead of bagging on the way we accquired the picks. |
Posts: 4,425
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2065047
|
Quote:
We traded our best DE for two reasons. Picks and he wanted the hell out of here. We actually got more for him than I thought we would. LJ won't get shit because he's not an all around back and he's been worked in the last couple of years. Teams don't want to trade for a RB they can only play on 1st and 2nd downs. Gonzo won't get traded because the front office won't do it. Gonzo is the face of this franchise. They know that if they trade him (good or bad) the fans will revolt. Show me proof that LJ was offered for Quinn. All I've seen is an article stating that the Chiefs contacted the Browns about Quinn and were told that he wasn't available. So until there is proof that an LJ for Quinn deal was offered....I'm not believing it. I didn't blast your post. I called it reeruned. It's reeruned to come in Week 3 with a mock draft where we trade seven times throughout the draft and all of a sudden we come up with all of these great players in the 1st round. Oher is not falling till the 28th pick. |
|
Posts: 92,316
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|