Chiefs Herm\Carl take Chiefs to new low!!! - Page 9

**petegz28** · 10-14-2008, 02:38 PM

Ok, I know there was a lot of drama over the trades but the reality is we have AT LEAST 2, and in that case our BEST 2, players that want out from under Carl, Herm and the Chiefs. So after Allen opined in the same manner last year, one has to wonder how many people on this team really want to be here?

So who is the next one to want out from the disaster Herm and Co have created? Bowe? Charles? Flowers or Carr?

You can debate whether TG and LJ are right or wrong all you want. The fact is we have a team now where the best guys don't want to be here.

WAY TO ****ING REBUILD CARL!!!

Herm has ruined this team where Carl couldn't.

Boris The Great · 10-14-2008, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Just imagine in 3 years what we can write about what Herm did to this franchise...

You mean like:

- Brought about sweeping change in the organization
- Took power away from King Carl
- Made the team focus on the draft
- Stopped the team from blowing their money on FAs who never deliver
- Actually tried to build a team the right way

Even if Herm never wins another game as Chiefs coach and the offense finishes with negative yards in every game, he has already done more positive things for this franchise than anyone else in a decade.

**petegz28** · 10-14-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Then the burden of proof is on you, ****tard.

Show PROOF.

Otherwise, quit making shit up to suit your argument.

Why I took your dumb ass off my ignore list is beyond me?

I am sorry, I forgot, John Tait, Carl and you were having nut-munching 3-somes with each other.

I did not mean to offend your sugar daddy.

John Tait and Carl loved each other. What the **** was I thinking ?

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-14-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

I suggest you go back and check some stats. This is the worst Chiefs team ever.

I suggest you look at the records of each Chiefs team from 1974-1989.

You're a ****ing moron.

2 losing seasons in a row, or 13 losing seasons out of 15 between '74-'89?

triple · 10-14-2008, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

I don't know John Tait. All I do know is that he signed with another team for far, far more money than he was going to get here. I don't hold it personally against him and I don't think he does either. He did what was right for him.

I would have done what he did too.

Frosty · 10-14-2008, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk

Have you missed this new trend about the Wildcat formation? The Dolphins are scoring TDs with it every week - the Browns used it last night, etc. It's basically the option. I saw the Niners run the option this weekend too.

Exactly. The Chiefs do it three weeks ago and they are idiots. The Browns do it on MNF and they are creative genius'.

The problem was the Chiefs did it badly.

**petegz28** · 10-14-2008, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great

You mean like:

- Brought about sweeping change in the organization
- Took power away from King Carl
- Made the team focus on the draft
- Stopped the team from blowing their money on FAs who never deliver
- Actually tried to build a team the right way

Even if Herm never wins another game as Chiefs coach and the offense finishes with negative yards in every game, he has already done more positive things for this franchise than anyone else in a decade.

So 3 years and we still can't get more than 1 yard on 1st down and that is building the team the right way?

This is ****ing classic!

**petegz28** · 10-14-2008, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arc

Exactly. The Chiefs do it three weeks ago and they are idiots. The Browns do it on MNF and they are creative genius'.

The problem was the Chiefs did it badly.

We need to focus on the basics first, like getting a 1st down quicker than 24 mins and 4 possessions into the game.

FAX · 10-14-2008, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zouk

Have you missed this new trend about the Wildcat formation? The Dolphins are scoring TDs with it every week - the Browns used it last night, etc. It's basically the option. I saw the Niners run the option this weekend too.

No. What I did miss, though, was the part where we scored a touchdown with the sloption. Or gained a yard. Or made a positive gain. Or fooled anybody. Or accomplished anything. Whatsoever.

FAX

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-14-2008, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Why I took your dumb ass off my ignore list is beyond me?

I am sorry, I forgot, John Tait, Carl and you were having nut-munching 3-somes with each other.

I did not mean to offend your sugar daddy.

John Tait and Carl loved each other. What the **** was I thinking ?

Nice deflection, ****stick.

I'm not defending anyone. The entire FO needs to be whacked.

However, you're talking out of your ass.

Sorry you don't like getting called out. Maybe you should think before you post.

So, like I said, PROVE the premise of your argument.

It's YOUR argument, how hard is it to PROVE it?

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-14-2008, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple

I would have done what he did too.

You mean take $14 million up front?

Was that some sort of statement or something?

jspchief · 10-14-2008, 03:29 PM

The only thing we know for a fact about the Tait situation is that Chicago offered more than KC was willing to (or should have) paid. We can speculate about the Tait Carl relationship and what effect it may have had on re-signing him, but it's only speculation. Money is why we lost Tait. Period.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-14-2008, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

The only thing we know for a fact about the Tait situation is that Chicago offered more than KC was willing to (or should have) paid. We can speculate about the Tait Carl relationship and what effect it may have had on re-signing him, but it's only speculation. Money is why we lost Tait. Period.

Ding.

bobbything · 10-14-2008, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I suggest you look at the records of each Chiefs team from 1974-1989.

You're a ****ing moron.

2 losing seasons in a row, or 13 losing seasons out of 15 between '74-'89?

I'll reserve my judgment till the end of the season, but I can't remember a team that looked this bad. Maybe the 86-87 team. That team was bad. But I think they won 4 games. At this rate, I don't see us doing that well this year.

Many of the others between 1979-1989 hovered around 6-10 and 8-8. That's bad, but not this bad.

I bet we win 3 games this year and it is the worst Chiefs team since 1977.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-14-2008, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Who do we have that is better?

Tynes got a ring yes?

SO

you Herm-sperm eater!!

So, this is all about Tynes?

JFC.

Larry Twinkle-Toe Tynes?

He ****ing sucks.

But I guess you're used to sucking off losers.

Boris The Great · 10-14-2008, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

So 3 years and we still can\'t get more than 1 yard on 1st down and that is building the team the right way?

So you think that building a team is based on how many hards a team gets on offense?

I see. No wonder you think Vermeil was great.

And no wonder everyone else thinks you are reeruned.

10-14-2008, 02:38 PM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-1095873	Herm\Carl take Chiefs to new low!!! Ok, I know there was a lot of drama over the trades but the reality is we have AT LEAST 2, and in that case our BEST 2, players that want out from under Carl, Herm and the Chiefs. So after Allen opined in the same manner last year, one has to wonder how many people on this team really want to be here? So who is the next one to want out from the disaster Herm and Co have created? Bowe? Charles? Flowers or Carr? You can debate whether TG and LJ are right or wrong all you want. The fact is we have a team now where the best guys don't want to be here. WAY TO ****ING REBUILD CARL!!! Herm has ruined this team where Carl couldn't.
Posts: 132,504

10-14-2008, 03:29 PM	#131
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	The only thing we know for a fact about the Tait situation is that Chicago offered more than KC was willing to (or should have) paid. We can speculate about the Tait Carl relationship and what effect it may have had on re-signing him, but it's only speculation. Money is why we lost Tait. Period. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something is more important than fear. The brave may not live forever but the cautious do not live at all.
Posts: 27,207