Go on the record: Who do you want as GM and Head Coach?

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

#1) He's not underperforming
#2) The last thing we need is another system only disciple that eschews the talent on hand for his ideal defense. That's how we went from 15th to 32nd

Hell, depending on the season, Belichick has used a 4-3 or 3-4. He even used a prowl formation in certain games (against Bledsoe, and against the Bills in SB XXV).

If you were a SF Giants fan, would you want the Giants to hire a manager who installs a pitch to contact philosophy and tells Tim Lincecum to start throwing nothing but two seamers? If you are a Cavs fan, would you want the coach to install the motion offense where LeBron becomes a cog rather than the driver of the O?

Why would you minimize the talent you already have on hand just because you are married to a scheme that is no more or less successful than any other scheme on defense?

It's myopic.

Seriously. I'm done.

He's not MARRIED to a scheme.

He runs a 34 hybrid NOW.

He's run a 43 in the PAST.

This isn't that difficult to understand.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Seriously. I'm done.

He's not MARRIED to a scheme.

He runs a 34 hybrid NOW.

He's run a 43 in the PAST.

This isn't that difficult to understand.

Then stop throwing the thing out as a possibility by listing the merits of Dorsey as an end and Tank Johnson as a nose tackle.

And I'm not just talking about Rex Ryan, I'm talking about any person, writ large (obviously indicated in my post above) that values scheme over the talents of the individuals, and I've made that abundantly clear several times in this thread.