|
|
View Poll Results: Who would you rather have? | |||
Sanchez |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
66 | 35.11% |
Stafford |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
85 | 45.21% |
Neither. Give me a DE. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 15.43% |
Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 4.26% |
Voters: 188. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
Champs!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Casino cash: $3738476
|
So, even though we haven't have the combines, stats, etc etc (Not that it's gonna matter much to Pioli) it's almost a sure thing that Stafford is a top 5.
Let's assume the Lions take Stafford, and the Rams take a OT, which leaves the Chiefs and the possibility of getting Sanchez for the 3rd pick. Keep in mind I'm only asking, but would it be considered a "reach" even though he is projected at top 10, but not a "Top 3" or "Top 5" status?
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Posts: 54,703
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|