Chiefs Carl the reason our d sucked last year

chiefsngop · 01-17-2009, 12:22 PM

Nah... It wasn't just the JA trade, and this "saddled with the wrong players" excuse is tired.

Gunther went from average, to way below average, because we have a head coach that forced him to use the Tampa 2.

The Tampa 2 is not Gun's cup of tea, nor did it fit with our personnel. It's also outdated.

But Gun's average at best, even without a forced upon him sh*tbag scheme. So he has to go.

Gun only looked great when he was surrounded with very very high talent.

We need a D-coord. who can put a decent defense on the field with only 75 - 80% of the puzzle put together.

With Gun, we'd have to wait till nearly every single positon was upgraded with a very high caliber player, just to have an effective defense. And with the state of our D right now, that could be a very long wait. No Thanks.

01-17-2009, 12:22 PM	#7
chiefsngop Starter Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	Nah... It wasn't just the JA trade, and this "saddled with the wrong players" excuse is tired. Gunther went from average, to way below average, because we have a head coach that forced him to use the Tampa 2. The Tampa 2 is not Gun's cup of tea, nor did it fit with our personnel. It's also outdated. But Gun's average at best, even without a forced upon him shtbag scheme. So he has to go. Gun only looked great when he was surrounded with very very high talent. We need a D-coord. who can put a decent defense on the field with only 75 - 80% of the puzzle put together. With Gun, we'd have to wait till nearly every single positon was upgraded with a very high caliber player, just to have an effective defense. And with the state of our D right now, that could be a very long wait. No Thanks. __________________ We'll be fine. At least Carl Peterson's 5 year plan is finally completed. Last edited by chiefsngop; 01-17-2009 at 12:29 PM..*
Posts: 494