Chiefs Rumor from Shanahan's son

BigChiefFan · 01-22-2009, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

No excuses, just passionate about the game I love.

That's not passion, that's reerunation. Supporting a man who has SIX wins out of 32 games in the past two seasons is like supporting Charles Manson to run a daycare. He's not a good coach and I could give a **** if the players like the coach-it isn't up to them. I want WINS and Herm has a grand TOTAL of 15 wins as the Head Coach of the Chiefs. That's an average of 5 wins per season and you want him back? Sorry, but anybody that supports a losing record doesn't have the Chiefs best interest in mind, yourself included.

DaWolf · 01-22-2009, 11:54 AM

Here it is officially from Schefter:

http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/01/22/chie...cted-shanahan/

Quote:

Nearly a month after the season, the Chiefs still have not made a coaching change. Mike Shanahan still does not have a job.

Thus, in the past 24 hours, like a virus that has spread, some have concluded that Kansas City is pursuing Shanahan and he could be the Chiefs next head coach.

Time to squash that rumor. As of mid-day Thursday, the Chiefs and Shanahan have not had any contact. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

And yet within the past hour, I’ve gotten a half-dozen calls and emails from various Kansas City and Denver media outlets, asking if there is any truth to the rumor that the Chiefs and Shanahan are talking.

No, there is not. There is no truth to the rumor. Chiefs officials are at the Senior Bowl and Shanahan just finished a morning run on the treadmill.

The Chiefs coaching mystery continues — minus Shanahan.

siberian khatru · 01-22-2009, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf

Here it is officially from Schefter:

http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/01/22/chie...cted-shanahan/

Well, he's definitely put his ass out there. He's gonna look really bad if the Rat suddenly gets hired, although I guess he could cover himself by saying "It all came together AFTER I posted that ..."

Pretty definitive, though. Do we believe Schefter with his Denver connection, or Garcia Bronco with his alleged Kyle Shanahan encounter?

DaWolf · 01-22-2009, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru

Pretty definitive, though. Do we believe Schefter with his Denver connection, or Garcia Bronco with his alleged Kyle Shanahan encounter?

Just out of curiosity, but shouldn't Kyle be in either Houston or at the Senior Bowl? Not questioning the truthfulness of Garcia, but unless he knows the guy intimately and for some reason the Texans OC was in a Denver mall just hanging out and willing to spill the beans on his dad to a fan, who knows?

**penguinz** · 01-22-2009, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf

Here it is officially from Schefter:

http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/01/22/chie...cted-shanahan/

Because Pioli is going to let Schefter or anyone else know what he is doing. Just like some of the current coaches have stated they have been told they would be fired if they leaked anything maybe Pioli told the Rat that if he leaked anything the deal was off.

KC4EVER · 01-22-2009, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

That's not passion, that's reerunation. Supporting a man who has SIX wins out of 32 games in the past two seasons is like supporting Charles Manson to run a daycare. He's not a good coach and I could give a **** if the players like the coach-it isn't up to them. I want WINS and Herm has a grand TOTAL of 15 wins as the Head Coach of the Chiefs. That's an average of 5 wins per season and you want him back? Sorry, but anybody that supports a losing record doesn't have the Chiefs best interest in mind, yourself included.

I havn't read you saying one fact other than blowing your mouth about how this sucks and that sucks, come with some facts other than a win/loss record for a coach who was under the reign of King Carl.

Yeah your right, nobody wants a coach the players playing the game have total respect for and will do anything to win for him and the fans. Please remember just how young of a group we truly have, I'm telling you nobody went into this season (maybe you) thinking we were even going to get close to competing and now everbody wants to act suprised and blow it up again!

BigChiefFan · 01-22-2009, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

I havn't read you saying one fact other than blowing your mouth about how this sucks and that sucks, come with some facts other than a win/loss record for a coach who was under the reign of King Carl.

Yeah your right, nobody wants a coach the players playing the game have total respect for and will do anything to win for him and the fans. Please remember just how young of a group we truly have, I'm telling you nobody went into this season (maybe you) thinking we were even going to get close to competing and now everbody wants to act suprised and blow it up again!

Sorry but wins and loses are the MOST IMPORTANT stat you can go by for a HEAD COACH, especially after THREE FULL YEARS. What other stat is there for a Head Coach? Passes completed by Herm? Interceptions by Herm?

The man you support is a LOSER, evidenced by his record.

KC4EVER · 01-22-2009, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

Sorry but wins and loses are the MOST IMPORTANT stat you can go by for a HEAD COACH, especially after THREE FULL YEARS. What other stat is there for a Head Coach? Passes completed by Herm? Interceptions by Herm?

The man you support is a LOSER, evidenced by his record.

I agree, wins are the most important stat for head coach, my argument is that with the CURRENT roster, he hasn't been given a chance (other than one FULL year) to show what he can do with his guys and his system.

**The Franchise** · 01-22-2009, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

I agree, wins are the most important stat for head coach, my argument is that with the CURRENT roster, he hasn't been given a chance (other than one FULL year) to show what he can do with his guys and his system.

So how many more years does this guy get a ****ing pass?

KC4EVER · 01-22-2009, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23

So how many more years does this guy get a ****ing pass?

Again, I think he's only had ONE true year to do what he wanted to do and at least give the man his last year to prove himself otherwise.

**The Franchise** · 01-22-2009, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

Again, I think he's only had ONE true year to do what he wanted to do and at least give the man his last year to prove himself otherwise.

**** that. The guy has proven that he can't do shit with "his" roster. Explain to me why players have REGRESSED under his coaching? He has thrown everyone possible under the bus. He has shown that he can't manage a game for shit. Herm Edwards is not a head coach....he's a PR man.

BigChiefFan · 01-22-2009, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

Again, I think he's only had ONE true year to do what he wanted to do and at least give the man his last year to prove himself otherwise.

With what coordinators? You see, if we hire new coordinators, it's like he didn't do his job well enough in the first place, otherwise why replace his stellar coaching staff that HE CHOSE? Maybe because they sucked ass under his tutelage and is reason enough to find his replacement. Add his abyssmal record as HC of the Chiefs and that's more than enough evidence to see he isn't the coach of the future.

EyePod · 01-22-2009, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

I agree, wins are the most important stat for head coach, my argument is that with the CURRENT roster, he hasn't been given a chance (other than one FULL year) to show what he can do with his guys and his system.

Miami was able to turn it around in a year. Atlanta too. Why couldn't we?

bowener · 01-22-2009, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

I agree, wins are the most important stat for head coach, my argument is that with the CURRENT roster, he hasn't been given a chance (other than one FULL year) to show what he can do with his guys and his system.

Ultimately life is unequivocally unfair, more so for some than others.

Chiefs fans being in the 'for some' category.

BigChiefFan · 01-22-2009, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC4EVER

I agree, wins are the most important stat for head coach, my argument is that with the CURRENT roster, he hasn't been given a chance (other than one FULL year) to show what he can do with his guys and his system.

He's had THREE YEARS, if he and the GM didn't see eye to eye, he could have easily declined the job, but he ACCEPTED, knowing full well what the circumstances were. He also had Croyle for longer than a year. Same with Hali, Tyler, McBride, Pollard, etc...These are HIS PLAYERS and he failed miserably with HIS guys.