Football Housh to the Seahawks..

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-02-2009, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD

No crabs for the chickens which reduces the chance of trade down for us.

Actually, I think this helps us. With the addition of Houshmazilli, the only two positions I can see them going is LT or QB.

If someone wants one of the QB's, they may have to jump ahead of Seattle to get one.

No one was going to jump Seattle for fear they'd take Crabtree.

**doomy3** · 03-02-2009, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Actually, I think this helps us. With the addition of Houshmazilli, the only two positions I can see them going is LT or QB.

If someone wants one of the QB's, they may have to jump ahead of Seattle to get one.

No one was going to jump Seattle for fear they'd take Crabtree.

I was going to post this too. I could definitely see Seattle wanting to grab a QB to sit a couple years behind Hasselbeck.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-02-2009, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

I was going to post this too. I could definitely see Seattle wanting to grab a QB to sit a couple years behind Hasselbeck.

I actually think we might be in a better position to trade down regardless.

If the Lions take Stafford, then there might be teams that are looking for a LT that want to jump Seattle.

However, if Detroit passes on Stafford, I can't see Seattle doing the same - so someone wanting Stafford would have to jump Seattle to get him.

With this signing, Seattle has shown their cards, IMO.

If Stafford is available, they take him.

If he's not, they take whoever is left of Monroe/Smith.

**doomy3** · 03-02-2009, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I actually think we might be in a better position to trade down regardless.

If the Lions take Stafford, then there might be teams that are looking for a LT that want to jump Seattle.

However, if Detroit passes on Stafford, I can't see Seattle doing the same - so someone wanting Stafford would have to jump Seattle to get him.

With this signing, Seattle has shown their cards, IMO.

If Stafford is available, they take him.

If he's not, they take whoever is left of Monroe/Smith.

So, you don't think Seattle would want Sanchez?

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-02-2009, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

So, you don't think Seattle would want Sanchez?

Don't know.

Based on how everyone else is grading the QB's, I can only assume that if Stafford is there, they'll take him.

It really doesn't matter anyway in this scenario, the team trading with us to jump Seattle is doing so to make sure they get THEIR QB. They're not going to know which one Seattle is targeting.