Chiefs FA: What's Left?

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-09-2009, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

He was an unrestricted free agent.
Completely and totally free to sign with another franchise.
There was little interest so he resigned with Seattle.

That's no reason why this franchise shouldn't have brought him in to at least interview with the team.

We're not exactly the Cowboys or Niners or the '90s. We very well might have called, only for him to say he wasn't interested.

Which would effectively make him unavailable to us.

ChiefRon · 03-09-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

We're not exactly the Cowboys or Niners or the '90s. We very well might have called, only for him to say he wasn't interested.

And there's the unknown to all of this.

Were we "active" in the sense of making phone calls, with a lot of "No thanks" as responses?

**OnTheWarpath15** · 03-09-2009, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon

And there's the unknown to all of this.

Were we "active" in the sense of making phone calls, with a lot of "No thanks" as responses?

That's my guess. Pioli can't possibly think that this roster gives him a chance to win games on a consistent basis.

Micjones · 03-09-2009, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

We're not exactly the Cowboys or Niners or the '90s. We very well might have called, only for him to say he wasn't interested.

Which would effectively make him unavailable to us.

You could very well be right, but I tend to think with very few visits scheduled the Chiefs probably haven't made many phone calls.