Football Draft Changes - NFL announces to Draft Order (Starting in 2010)

Crush · 12:50 PM

Per the ticker on ESPNEWS:

NFL owners vote to alter the draft order for playoff teams based on how far they go. (Starting in 2010)

Per ESPN:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4015265

DANA POINT, Calif. -- The NFL owners concluded their annual meeting Wednesday by voting to alter the draft order of pick Nos. 21 through 30 based on the teams' performance in the playoffs.

Under the new draft order, which will take effect in 2010, the order of teams not in the playoffs is still based on record -- i.e., the team with the worst record will receive the No. 1 draft pick.

For the rest, there will be a reseeding based on how far the teams go in the playoffs. For example, the losers of the wild-card games will be seeded 21st through 24th based on their records.

Winners in the divisional rounds will be seeded 25th through 28th. Teams eliminated in the conference championship games will be seeded 29th and 30th.

The Super Bowl loser will be seeded 31st. The Super Bowl winner will receive the final pick in the draft.

The competition committee recommended the change -- which the owners passed 32-0 -- after watching the San Diego Chargers go 8-8 as a division champion in 2008, then win a game in the playoffs. But the Chargers drafted ahead of teams that didn't make the playoffs, and well ahead of the Indianapolis Colts, whom they beat in the playoffs.

The Jacksonville Jaguars withdrew their playoff seeding proposal, which would have given home games to wild-card teams based strictly on their records, instead of seeding teams higher if they win division titles. The Jaguars have been pushing this proposal for two years, but it didn't have enough support.

Two minor rule changes also were adopted:
• If a fumble or backward pass goes out of bounds, the game clock will start when the official places the ball in play.
• The NFL eliminated a second onside kick chance if the first onside kick goes out of bounds. The competition committee believed that bad onside kicks should not be rewarded with a second opportunity.

jwazzie · 03-25-2009, 12:23 PM

I like it alot. I think it should be this way.

talastan · 03-25-2009, 12:25 PM

Good about time that they put this into effect.

seclark · 03-25-2009, 12:28 PM

well, the chiefs would have been a helluva different team if this had...oh forget it.
sec

**Mr. Kotter** · 03-25-2009, 12:43 PM

It would seem to penalize a team that happens to get hot at the end of the year....

Ala, Arizona this past year, the Giants two years ago....etc.

Crush · 03-25-2009, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

It would seem to penalize a team that happens to get hot at the end of the year....

Ala, Arizona this past year, the Giants two years ago....etc.

Yep, but I think it will be for the better.

**Buck** · 03-25-2009, 01:13 PM

Any word on the Hochuli rule?

EyePod · 03-25-2009, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

It would seem to penalize a team that happens to get hot at the end of the year....

Ala, Arizona this past year, the Giants two years ago....etc.

The SB losers/SB winners already pick 31/32. Arizona is picking 31 this year, without this rule. This just makes it go throughout the entire playoffs. I really wish that they would be able to do this now so the bolts didn't get a higher pick.... WTG AFC West!!! Mediocrity won a game!!!

Oh, and I think the Chiefs are less likely to get hot than a 90 year old woman who just had a hysterectomy.

Mr. Krab · 03-25-2009, 01:16 PM

good change imo

chiefs1111 · 03-25-2009, 01:17 PM

good,that's the way it should be

**HemiEd** · 03-25-2009, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talastan

Good about time that they put this into effect.

Yeah, the Chiefs would have benifited from this rule a few times. One and done, would finally have a reward.

ArrowheadHawk · 03-25-2009, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd

Yeah, the Chiefs would have benifited from this rule a few times. One and done, would finally have a reward.

Ouch.

03-25-2009, 12:22 PM
Crush Amateur Poster Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $2257091	Draft Changes - NFL announces Changes to Draft Order (Starting in 2010) Per the ticker on ESPNEWS: NFL owners vote to alter the draft order for playoff teams based on how far they go. (Starting in 2010) Per ESPN: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4015265 DANA POINT, Calif. -- The NFL owners concluded their annual meeting Wednesday by voting to alter the draft order of pick Nos. 21 through 30 based on the teams' performance in the playoffs. Under the new draft order, which will take effect in 2010, the order of teams not in the playoffs is still based on record -- i.e., the team with the worst record will receive the No. 1 draft pick. For the rest, there will be a reseeding based on how far the teams go in the playoffs. For example, the losers of the wild-card games will be seeded 21st through 24th based on their records. Winners in the divisional rounds will be seeded 25th through 28th. Teams eliminated in the conference championship games will be seeded 29th and 30th. The Super Bowl loser will be seeded 31st. The Super Bowl winner will receive the final pick in the draft. The competition committee recommended the change -- which the owners passed 32-0 -- after watching the San Diego Chargers go 8-8 as a division champion in 2008, then win a game in the playoffs. But the Chargers drafted ahead of teams that didn't make the playoffs, and well ahead of the Indianapolis Colts, whom they beat in the playoffs. The Jacksonville Jaguars withdrew their playoff seeding proposal, which would have given home games to wild-card teams based strictly on their records, instead of seeding teams higher if they win division titles. The Jaguars have been pushing this proposal for two years, but it didn't have enough support. Two minor rule changes also were adopted: • If a fumble or backward pass goes out of bounds, the game clock will start when the official places the ball in play. • The NFL eliminated a second onside kick chance if the first onside kick goes out of bounds. The competition committee believed that bad onside kicks should not be rewarded with a second opportunity. Last edited by Crush; 03-25-2009 at 12:50 PM..
Posts: 15,298

03-25-2009, 12:23 PM	#2
jwazzie Big Headed Baby Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Somewhere in the US Casino cash: $10004607	I like it alot. I think it should be this way. __________________ Who dat?....Who dare?
Posts: 465

03-25-2009, 12:25 PM	#3
talastan Manning, we're coming for you! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Springfield, Mo Casino cash: $10004950	Good about time that they put this into effect. __________________ Can we please just draft AND DEVELOP a QB - est. since 1983 Check out my band: Truett and the Traitors
Posts: 4,815

03-25-2009, 12:28 PM	#4
seclark MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: nemo Casino cash: $-410100	well, the chiefs would have been a helluva different team if this had...oh forget it. sec __________________ "Mr. seclark. Wrong for gravy, wrong for jelly, wrong for biscuits." -rj "If every Planeteer who was disliked by another Planeteer stopped being a Planeteer we wouldn't have any Planeteers." -rj
Posts: 13,447

03-25-2009, 12:43 PM	#5
Mr. Kotter The Dude Abides Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Dakota Country Casino cash: $3234285	It would seem to penalize a team that happens to get hot at the end of the year.... Ala, Arizona this past year, the Giants two years ago....etc. __________________ "I've always said I worry about legacy and winning rings more than making money at this moment...We see what's going on around the league, but at the same time, I'll never do anything that's going to hurt us from keeping the great players around me.”
Posts: 46,942

03-25-2009, 01:13 PM	#7
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $5980295	Any word on the Hochuli rule?
Posts: 44,607

03-25-2009, 01:16 PM	#9
Mr. Krab Big Red Nuts Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $10004900	good change imo
Posts: 3,512

03-25-2009, 01:17 PM	#10
chiefs1111 In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $-2356834	good,that's the way it should be
Posts: 21,099