You're a Chiefs football reerun if...

[Reaper16]

Originally Posted by SportsRacer

Methinks you've missed the fact that his posts appear to be drenched in irony.

No. You haven't paid attention to him these past few months.

[Thig Lyfe]

Originally Posted by Reaper16

No. You haven't paid attention to him these past few months.

I guess not.

[doomy3]

Originally Posted by Reaper16

No. You haven't paid attention to him these past few months.

Please explain. I would love to hear about my "uninformed posts."

[Reaper16]

Originally Posted by doomy3

Please explain. I would love to hear about my "uninformed posts."

Well, I said unstudied. Unless they're a dummy, one can quickly ascertain that. But my using the word unstudied was mainly drawn out of your apparent support for drinking beers before a game instead of breaking down game tape. The people whom you've been disagreeing with a lot lately regarding Cassel, the draft, etc. are typically the same people that are likely to "break down game tape," and take their enjoyment of football to a nerdier level, if you will. You seem to be advocating more of a stop-taking-this-so-seriously-and-be-a-fan approach to football, which is fine. But it means that your takes are if not unstudied then less-studied than some other's.

[doomy3]

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Well, I said unstudied. Unless they're a dummy, one can quickly ascertain that. But my using the word unstudied was mainly drawn out of your apparent support for drinking beers before a game instead of breaking down game tape. The people whom you've been disagreeing with a lot lately regarding Cassel, the draft, etc. are typically the same people that are likely to "break down game tape," and take their enjoyment of football to a nerdier level, if you will. You seem to be advocating more of a stop-taking-this-so-seriously-and-be-a-fan approach to football, which is fine. But it means that your takes are if not unstudied then less-studied than some other's.

Are you kidding?

So, because I actually enjoy the game and enjoy the tailgating and the environment around Arrowhead, that means I am unstudied? This shit is hilarious.

One thing I will agree with is that people need to stop taking things so seriously, but it's not so much the info, it's that they need to quit taking themselves so seriously.

FWIW, I would imagine when it comes down to it, I agree with a lot of the actual info and opinions that are thrown around here by many of the know-it-alls. It is just impossible for me to be grouped in with them so I often times find myself arguing the opposite point even if I don't necessarily agree with that 100%, because one of the biggest downfalls of this board, IMO, is the absolute that there is no other way other than "my" way.

There are many different directions that Pioli could go in this draft, and I'm not sure any of them would be the "wrong" way. If we draft a QB there, I can see why we would do that, and will support it. In fact, if Stafford is there, I think we should definitely draft him unless we are blown away in a trade. However, if they take a guy like Curry, Raji, Brown, or God forbid, even Crabtree or a tackle, I can see why they would do that too. My first choice would be to trade down, but as these same people who are just saying that is what we need to do were saying last year, that is not always just as easy as trading down. There my not be a trade worth taking, or a team that even wants to trade up to 3. Plus, all I read last year was that you NEVER trade out of the top 5 because that's where the elite talent is. Only teams that are scared would trade out of the top 5. I wonder what happened to that belief? Or the belief that last year was the last time for awhile that there would be a QB worth taking that high because the QBs this year were going to suck. Sounds pretty familiar to this year, huh?

[Reaper16]

Originally Posted by doomy3

So, because I actually enjoy the game and enjoy the tailgating and the environment around Arrowhead, that means I am unstudied? This shit is hilarious.

I don't think those things are mutually exclusive, but you brought up the distinction in the first place. I was just operating with it.

Originally Posted by doomy3

FWIW, I would imagine when it comes down to it, I agree with a lot of the actual info and opinions that are thrown around here by many of the know-it-alls. It is just impossible for me to be grouped in with them so I often times find myself arguing the opposite point even if I don't necessarily agree with that 100%, because one of the biggest downfalls of this board, IMO, is the absolute that there is no other way other than "my" way.

Fair enough.

Originally Posted by doomy3

Plus, all I read last year was that you NEVER trade out of the top 5 because that's where the elite talent is. Only teams that are scared would trade out of the top 5. I wonder what happened to that belief? Or the belief that last year was the last time for awhile that there would be a QB worth taking that high because the QBs this year were going to suck. Sounds pretty familiar to this year, huh?

Sure, some people thought that there wouldn't be a QB worth taking in this class. I would disagree with those people. There were also people last year who didn't think that Matt Ryan was worth taking; I'd have disagreed with them, too. You are right in that its usually a bad idea to trade out of the top 5. This draft is an abnormal one; the lack of "elite" talent has been oft-discussed.

[DTLB58]

If you thought we were going to trade Cassel to Denver for Cutler.....

If you think we are going to trade Cassel to Denver for picks so we can draft any of the QB's in the upcoming draft.

If you begged and pleaded with Clark Hunt until we signed Pioli "our savior" but now bash him for the Cassel trade and will burn him at the stake for drafting Curry. BEFORE we even play one season, hence, stating you think you know more than the 2 time NFL excutive of the year.

You proclaim this to tbe the best Chiefs offseason "EVER" and then proceed to bash management the next day.

[Tiger's Fan]

Originally Posted by DTLB58

If you thought we were going to trade Cassel to Denver for Cutler.....

If you think we are going to trade Cassel to Denver for picks so we can draft any of the QB's in the upcoming draft.

If you begged and pleaded with Clark Hunt until we signed Pioli "our savior" but now bash him for the Cassel trade and will burn him at the stake for drafting Curry. BEFORE we even play one season, hence, stating you think you know more than the 2 time NFL excutive of the year.

You proclaim this to tbe the best Chiefs offseason "EVER" and then proceed to bash management the next day.

You're too intelligent, and may not have a place on this BB, unless you have the patience of Job to put up with the stupidity strewn here on a regular basis.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Well, I said unstudied. Unless they're a dummy, one can quickly ascertain that. But my using the word unstudied was mainly drawn out of your apparent support for drinking beers before a game instead of breaking down game tape. The people whom you've been disagreeing with a lot lately regarding Cassel, the draft, etc. are typically the same people that are likely to "break down game tape," and take their enjoyment of football to a nerdier level, if you will. You seem to be advocating more of a stop-taking-this-so-seriously-and-be-a-fan approach to football, which is fine. But it means that your takes are if not unstudied then less-studied than some other's.

What the Fark is going on in here?