Scout.com's Mock Draft - 04-03-2009

[The Franchise]

Complete with a trade.

http://profootball.scout.com/2/853317.html

KC receives: #12 and #18

Denver receives: #3

Sanchez goes #1 to the Lions
Monroe goes #2 to the Rams
Stafford goes #3 to the Broncos
Jason Smith goes #4 to the Rams
Jesus Christ goes #5 to the Broncos



The Chiefs get:

#12 - Tyson Jackson, DE, LSU
#18 - Andre Smith, OT, Alabama

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by RustShack

What do you swoon over, the average of one TD a year or the wrap up ability of a late round draft pick?

Curry is a much better all around LB than Rey. If KC had the 15th pick and were going to immediately switch over to a 3-4 then you consider Rey.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Curry is a much better all around LB than Rey. If KC had the 15th pick and were going to immediately switch over to a 3-4 then you consider Rey.

Rey can play ILB in a 3-4 and MLB in a 4-3.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Curry is a much better all around LB than Rey. If KC had the 15th pick and were going to immediately switch over to a 3-4 then you consider Rey.

If KC had the 10th pick and were going to play a 4-3, then you consider Curry.

[RustShack]

Drafting Curry #3 is about like drafting a Kicker in the first round.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

If KC had the 10th pick and were going to play a 4-3, then you consider Curry.

It's funny you say that when you admit yourself that if KC stays at 3 you take Curry.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

It's funny you say that when you admit yourself that if KC stays at 3 you take Curry.

GD....there is a difference between thinking that we're going to take Curry at #3 and WANTING to take Curry at #3.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23

GD....there is a difference between thinking that we're going to take Curry at #3 and WANTING to take Curry at #3.

GD - Parker said if forced to pick at 3 he'd take Curry, not that he thinks KC will.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

It's funny you say that when you admit yourself that if KC stays at 3 you take Curry.

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

GD - Parker said if forced to pick at 3 he'd take Curry, not that he thinks KC will.

Sure seems like he's advocating picking a QB at 3 to me.

Originally Posted by htismaqe

You're right, we do have to pick someone. If you're left picking out of necessity, why not grab the best value you can?

God forbid that we pick what many consider to be an impact player at the greatest position of value on the field.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Sure seems like he's advocating picking a QB at 3 to me.

Maybe he changed his mind in the last week. Last week he said he holds his nose and takes Curry.

[OnTheWarpath15]

I'm guessing Parker actually answered one of those classic Chiefnj2 questions like, "You can't take a QB, OT, DE or OLB - and you can't trade down. Who do you take?" and he's going to hold the answer over Parker's head for the foreseeable future.

[melbar]

Originally Posted by RustShack

Drafting Curry #3 is about like drafting a Kicker in the first round.

Man I hope your kidding...hard to tell lately.

[Tribal Warfare]

no ****in way KC selects Tyson Jackson at the #12 spot

[melbar]

I wouldnt mind Laurinitus at 18.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I'm guessing Parker actually answered one of those classic Chiefnj2 questions like, "You can't take a QB, OT, DE or OLB - and you can't trade down. Who do you take?" and he's going to hold the answer over Parker's head for the foreseeable future.

I think the question was KC is staying at 3, Stafford and Smith are off the board, who do you take. I'm sure it's a difficult question for you to understand and process.

[RustShack]

Everette Brown mother ****ers! Pioli isn't afraid to reach for stars! In all honestly though, the Patriots never acted like ILB was a big need for them, they always just used old veterans. I don't see why hes going to change his philosophy and try building a team the opposite of what hes done before.