Your Top 5 picks for the #3 overall. - Page 13

Direckshun · 04-07-2009, 02:06 PM

Who do you want the Chiefs to take with the #3 overall?

Seriously. I want you to see what ChiefsPlanet regards as elite, #3 talent.

All choices are welcome here. This is just me picking your brain. This thread is largely debate-free.

Thanks in advance for the honesty.

SBK · 04-08-2009, 04:16 PM

findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

SBK · 04-08-2009, 04:18 PM

Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.

**doomy3** · 04-08-2009, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.

Well, Robert Gallery could most definitely be a better draft pick than Jamarcus Russell...

Saccopoo · 04-08-2009, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.

See? This is the type of stupidity that runs rampant on this board. Don't answer a direct question, but rather make some irrelevant smart ass remark because you are either:

a. Wrong
b. Stupid

Gallery was initially played at the LT spot his rookie season, so the logical assumption would be that he was initially drafted to play at the left tackle position. However, Leonard Davis played at guard for the first three years of his career. In his fourth season, the Cardinals decided to try him at LT, but found that he was more effective at his natural guard position. Dallas acquired him prior to the start of the 2007 season, giving him a seven year, $49 million dollar contract to play GUARD, which he did effectively enough to be voted to the Pro Bowl in 2008.

Mecca · 04-08-2009, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

The ones this year are far worse.

KCrockaholic · 04-08-2009, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I think people understand the QB position plenty.

I also think that common sense tells you that the Chiefs aren't taking a QB third overall after trading a 2nd rounder for one just months ago.

I'm not putting QBs in my top 5 because I don't think there is a realistic chance it happens.

1. Curry
2. Crabtree
3. Raji
4. Smith
5. Brown

Best top 5 ive seen so far. Although Brown is growing on me. I would put him above Smith.

KCrockaholic · 04-08-2009, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

Well, Robert Gallery could most definitely be a better draft pick than Jamarcus Russell...

As bad as they both are...This is the truth.

ChiefsCountry · 04-08-2009, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

Findthedr actually knew some football he just had his mouth on Trevor Laws dick all the time.

CupidStunt · 04-08-2009, 05:23 PM

1. Brown
2. Sanchez
3. Curry
4. J. Smith
5. Stafford

SBK · 04-08-2009, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

As bad as they both are...This is the truth.

Picking a LG at 2 and paying him over $50,000,000 is as bad as picking someone who flames out of the league before their first contract is up.

If you pick a LT (the only position on the O-line you pick that high) in the top 5 and they play G that pick was a massive bust, no matter how good of a G they are.

Saccopoo · 04-08-2009, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

Picking a LG at 2 and paying him over $50,000,000 is as bad as picking someone who flames out of the league before their first contract is up.

If you pick a LT (the only position on the O-line you pick that high) in the top 5 and they play G that pick was a massive bust, no matter how good of a G they are.

Okie dokes. Just so I know now.

If you are a guard, and make it to the Pro Bowl = suckage/bustola.

Thank you SBK, that helps to clarify the whole discussion.

However...

It is kinda weird to see that three of the top five offensive linemen in the NFL in terms of 2008 salaries were interior linemen (not tackles). Maybe all the NFL GM's should be reading this board so that they have a better understanding of positional value and so they can better negotiate with the players and their agents.

milkman · 04-08-2009, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

You may be the dumbest person on this board. Seriously. Did you just talk to someone in the Cardinals organization and they specifically told you that they drafted him to be a LT? Because, it seems to me, that if you are drafted to play LT, then you play LT. However, Davis played GUARD for not only his first season in the league with the team that drafted him, but also his second and third. That would indicate that *gasp* they drafted him to play guard, since that's what they exactly did.

Not at the #2 spot. Guards, quality guards can be found deep into the draft. I wouldn't have drafted him at the #2 spot to play guard. Cardinals apparently did though. If it works you up this much, perhaps you should call some one in their organization and see if you can't get a satisfactory explanation on their reasoning behind the pick. I'd hate to see you get an ulcer or something over this.

So, you think that if a guy gets voted to the Pro Bowl in his eighth season of playing football in the league, who has started every game he's played in, a vote by his peers no less, that that means exactly jack? Yeah, I guess the players don't know shit, and we should take the word of some internet dildo who thinks that you can still be an eighth year pro, get voted to the Pro Bowl and still be a bust. Thanks for clearing that up for us Milk. You da man!

This must be a case of the classic euphemism "Takes one to know one."

Good god, you are the stupoidest mother****er to ever pound on a keyboard.

I don't give a rat's ass where they played him for his first three seasons, they didn't draft a player that high in the draft to play guard.

They clearly saw what became evident when they did finally play him there to everyone to see.

He sucked ass at LT.

Only a ****ing moron of epic proportions would even think to suggest that he was drafted to play guard with the #2 overall pick.

Jesus Christ, I didn't think it was possible to be this ****ing stupid.

Hell, there isn't a descriptor to do justice to your stupidity.

Hammock Parties · 04-08-2009, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

1. Trade down.
2. Trade down.
3. Trade down.
4. Trade down.
5. Trade down.

Yup.

NO ONE we draft at #3 is going to be worth a 50 million dollar contract.

NO ONE.

Unless it's Sanchez. If we take him we're trading him, IMO.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 04-08-2009, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

You may be the dumbest person on this board. Seriously. Did you just talk to someone in the Cardinals organization and they specifically told you that they drafted him to be a LT? Because, it seems to me, that if you are drafted to play LT, then you play LT. However, Davis played GUARD for not only his first season in the league with the team that drafted him, but also his second and third. That would indicate that *gasp* they drafted him to play guard, since that's what they exactly did.

Not at the #2 spot. Guards, quality guards can be found deep into the draft. I wouldn't have drafted him at the #2 spot to play guard. Cardinals apparently did though. If it works you up this much, perhaps you should call some one in their organization and see if you can't get a satisfactory explanation on their reasoning behind the pick. I'd hate to see you get an ulcer or something over this.

So, you think that if a guy gets voted to the Pro Bowl in his eighth season of playing football in the league, who has started every game he's played in, a vote by his peers no less, that that means exactly jack? Yeah, I guess the players don't know shit, and we should take the word of some internet dildo who thinks that you can still be an eighth year pro, get voted to the Pro Bowl and still be a bust. Thanks for clearing that up for us Milk. You da man!

This must be a case of the classic euphemism "Takes one to know one."

He was drafted to play LT b/c he was drafted #2 overall and no one drafts guards in the top 15, let alone the top 2. Same with centers, right tackles and fullbacks.

Kill yourself.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 04-08-2009, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Hell, there isn't a descriptor to do justice to your stupidity.

The only thing I can think of:

If human rights were intelligence, he'd be the Holocaust.

04-07-2009, 02:06 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $2033447	Your Top 5 picks for the #3 overall. Who do you want the Chiefs to take with the #3 overall? Seriously. I want you to see what ChiefsPlanet regards as elite, #3 talent. All choices are welcome here. This is just me picking your brain. This thread is largely debate-free. Thanks in advance for the honesty.
Posts: 59,693

04-08-2009, 04:16 PM	#181
SBK Curry is the pick??? Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Georgia Casino cash: $10004900	findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo
Posts: 8,153

04-08-2009, 04:18 PM	#182
SBK Curry is the pick??? Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Georgia Casino cash: $10004900	Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.
Posts: 8,153

04-08-2009, 05:23 PM	#189
CupidStunt offense > defense Join Date: Jul 2005 Casino cash: $-806668	1. Brown 2. Sanchez 3. Curry 4. J. Smith 5. Stafford
Posts: 9,018