Scout.com's Mock Draft - 04-03-2009

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by AustinChief

Jesus dude.. I have to go.. but we can pick this up again later if you want...

BUT YES. I read your post and again... you aren't grasping the concept...

Show me twenty or thirty game breakdowns (in reality you should provide 2-3 years worth of ALL LTs) and then you have enough data to start making statements that are probably FACT... or at least opinion with enough fact to back it up...

You can't just make a claim... post one set of data and jump up and go "SEE, LOOK AT ME, I'M RIGHT!" That is like me saying Truman was the best president because he didn' do this or that... but NOT showing data whether any OTHER president did this or that or not.
Even that wouldn't be enough to properly trend...

JFC, this is ridiculous. You can say Jake Long was a great pick at 1 because he made a pro bowl and because you claim he has great feet and that is more than sufficient, and if someone challenges you with specific evidence from a game, as well as the reports of scouts that he doesn't, and points out numerous LTs, that we have all watched first hand (see the difference between Roaf and Jordan Black) that have not required and have required help, then they haven't proven enough.

What a preposterous amount of hypocrisy. That's just staggering, and that's not mentioning the obvious proof that you showed in not having read the article, when it precisely points out when, where, and by whom he was helped while you claimed that nothing of the sort was implied or said.