PFW: The Way We Hear It — draft edition

kcbubb · 04-09-2009, 09:44 AM

I would rather pick Monroe than Sanchez.

Think about this. When the Chiefs had the BEST offense in the NFL, they had Trent Green, Priest Holmes and Eddie Kennison at three of the most important positions on offense. All three were serviceable at best without a great offensive line.

Not my first choice, but I don't think it would be terrible.

htismaqe · 04-09-2009, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

I would rather pick Monroe than Sanchez.

Think about this. When the Chiefs had the BEST offense in the NFL, they had Trent Green, Priest Holmes and Eddie Kennison at three of the most important positions on offense. All three were serviceable at best without a great offensive line.

Not my first choice, but I don't think it would be terrible.

And they had ONE first round draft pick on the offensive line. ONE. And it wasnt' even ours. Will Shields, like ALOT of superior offensive guards, was a MID-ROUND PICK.

The idea that we'd move Albert, after the rookie season he had, is just preposterous. You don't **** with potential greatness. Ever.

SBK · 04-09-2009, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

I would rather pick Monroe than Sanchez.

Think about this. When the Chiefs had the BEST offense in the NFL, they had Trent Green, Priest Holmes and Eddie Kennison at three of the most important positions on offense. All three were serviceable at best without a great offensive line.

Not my first choice, but I don't think it would be terrible.

I enjoyed celebrating all those Super Bowl wins too!!

kcbubb · 04-09-2009, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

I enjoyed celebrating all those Super Bowl wins too!!

that was obviously bc of the defense not the offense. if any of Vermeils drafts would have been good, we could have had a chance.

SBK · 04-09-2009, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

that was obviously bc of the defense not the offense. if any of Vermeils drafts would have been good, we could have had a chance.

The point is with an all world O line we didn't win dick.

Chiefnj2 · 04-11-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

The point is with an all world O line we didn't win dick.

Was someone arguing that all you need is an all world OL to win championships?

SBK · 04-11-2009, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Was someone arguing that all you need is an all world OL to win championships?

Anyone that argues for taking a 2nd LT is making this point correct?

RustShack · 04-11-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Was someone arguing that all you need is an all world OL to win championships?

So then why are people suggesting taking another LT?

milkman · 04-11-2009, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

that was obviously bc of the defense not the offense. if any of Vermeils drafts would have been good, we could have had a chance.

Meanwhile Peyton Manning and the Colts have been successful for a decade, winning a lot more games than they've lost, winning playoff games, and winning the SB, all while having a mediocre or worse defense throughout.

The Steelers, last year, won a SB with a crappy O-Line.

04-09-2009, 09:44 AM	#1
kcbubb Veteran Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $5026719	I would rather pick Monroe than Sanchez. Think about this. When the Chiefs had the BEST offense in the NFL, they had Trent Green, Priest Holmes and Eddie Kennison at three of the most important positions on offense. All three were serviceable at best without a great offensive line. Not my first choice, but I don't think it would be terrible.
Posts: 2,557