|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $-1511081
|
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 48,905
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
It Goes On
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lees Summit
Casino cash: $10026331
|
No less a loophole than allowed the A11.
|
Posts: 18,295
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $-1511081
|
That's incorrect. A-11's formation is(I should say was) strictly intended for scrimmage kick formations. It does not satisfy the requirements for a legal offensive formation in two ways. The A-11 does not have 5 down offensive linemen, as required for a legal offensive formation. It also neglects the normal jersey numbering requirements for linemen in legal offensive formations.
The swinging gate on the other hand, does indeed have the required number of ineligible down offensive linemen, with the correct jersey numbering. They are simply in a different position, but they're still linemen on the line of scrimmage who are not eligible receivers. There is absolutely no loophole necessary to run it. It's simply a legal offensive formation with it's down linemen in a different position than normal. There are no extra eligible receivers as in the case of A-11. This shouldn't be difficult.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 48,905
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Say hello to my little friend
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Larryville
Casino cash: $9598422
|
Meh, whatever. It's over.
|
Posts: 47,314
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
It Goes On
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lees Summit
Casino cash: $10026331
|
Quote:
You also can't make hard and fast rules about what you can and can't do with "kicking formations" without doing away with fake punts and field goals. So far, the only real argument I see against this is "tradition." if that's really the argument, them the argument must logically be against the swinging gate, as well. Hell, tradition says players used to have no such thing as eligible and ineligible nbers, so it's weak to begin with. If leagues don't like it, fine. But let's not pretend there was anything illegal or non-traditional about it. |
|
Posts: 18,295
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $-1511081
|
Quote:
And fake punts and kicks are still perfectly safe due to the differences in jersey numbering and eligibility on obvious kicking/punting downs. That's how they closed the loophole. They revised the rules to provide distinction as to what downs would allow which formations. Quote:
__________________
![]() |
||
Posts: 48,905
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
It Goes On
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lees Summit
Casino cash: $10026331
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 18,295
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $-1511081
|
You're free to punt on first down if you'd like, or kick a FG on a down other than 4th. You just can't have 11 guys wearing receiver numbers on the field when you do so.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 48,905
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Everyone else is 'peasants'
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $9914900
|
Quote:
Here's a thought: since the players in the NFL have gradually evolved to be much bigger and much faster than previous generations, why not maybe make the field bigger? Then you can have all the traditional offense you want with a little more room to move around. |
|
Posts: 1,532
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $8069900
|
Quote:
JFC. |
|
Posts: 104,482
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|